2019Edward Elgar Publishing eBooksRequires access

Heterogeneous reaction versus interaction in spatial econometric regional growth and convergence models

Julie Le Gallo

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

In this chapter, we present the main econometric specifications capturing spatial heterogeneity, or models of absolute locations, and examine how these specifications can be extended to further allow for spatial autocorrelation models of heterogeneous reaction by emphasizing the complex links between spatial heterogeneity and spatial autocorrelation. We detail some of these issues in the growth and convergence context in this chapter by first presenting the specifications allowing for discrete heterogeneity, that is, when different parameters are estimated following spatial regimes including a focus on recent papers dealing with the endogenous detection of convergence in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Then we present continuous spatial heterogeneity models: geographically weighted regressions and models allowing for both continuous spatial heterogeneity and spatial autocorrelation. We conclude with some research directions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this chapter, we present the main econometric specifications capturing spatial heterogeneity, or models of absolute locations, and examine how these specifications can be extended to further allow for spatial autocorrelation models of heterogeneous reaction by emphasizing the complex links between spatial heterogeneity and spatial autocorrelation. We detail some of these issues in the growth and convergence context in this chapter by first presenting the specifications allowing for discrete heterogeneity, that is, when different parameters are estimated following spatial regimes including a focus on recent papers dealing with the endogenous detection of convergence in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Then we present continuous spatial heterogeneity models: geographically weighted regressions and models allowing for both continuous spatial heterogeneity and spatial autocorrelation. We conclude with some research directions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this chapter, we present the main econometric specifications capturing spatial heterogeneity, or models of absolute locations, and examine how these specifications can be extended to further allow for spatial autocorrelation models of heterogeneous reaction by emphasizing the complex links between spatial heterogeneity and spatial autocorrelation. We detail some of these issues in the growth and convergence context in this chapter by first presenting the specifications allowing for discrete heterogeneity, that is, when different parameters are estimated following spatial regimes including a focus on recent papers dealing with the endogenous detection of convergence in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Then we present continuous spatial heterogeneity models: geographically weighted regressions and models allowing for both continuous spatial heterogeneity and spatial autocorrelation. We conclude with some research directions.

Key concepts: Spatial analysis, Spatial heterogeneity, Autocorrelation, Econometrics, Convergence (economics), Spatial econometrics, Context (archaeology), Spatial contextual awareness

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Heterogeneous reaction versus interaction in spatial econometric regional growth and convergence models — Research Paper | ScholarLens