Assessing Treatment Effect Variation in Observational Studies: Results from a Data Challenge
Carlos M. Carvalho, Avi Feller, Jared S. Murray, Spencer Woody, David S. Yeager
Abstract
Open-access reader
Carlos M. Carvalho, Avi Feller, Jared S. Murray, Spencer Woody, David S. Yeager
Abstract
Open-access reader
A growing number of methods aim to assess the challenging question of treatment effect variation in observational studies.This special section of Observational Studies reports the results of a workshop conducted at the 2018 Atlantic Causal Inference Conference designed to understand the similarities and differences across these methods.We invited eight groups of researchers to analyze a synthetic observational data set that was generated using a recent large-scale randomized trial in education.Overall, participants employed a diverse set of methods, ranging from matching and flexible outcome modeling to semiparametric estimation and ensemble approaches.While there was broad consensus on the topline estimate, there were also large differences in estimated treatment effect moderation.This highlights the fact that estimating varying treatment effects in observational studies is often more challenging than estimating the average treatment effect alone.We suggest several directions for future work arising from this workshop.
OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A growing number of methods aim to assess the challenging question of treatment effect variation in observational studies.This special section of Observational Studies reports the results of a workshop conducted at the 2018 Atlantic Causal Inference Conference designed to understand the similarities and differences across these methods.We invited eight groups of researchers to analyze a synthetic observational data set that was generated using a recent large-scale randomized trial in education.Overall, participants employed a diverse set of methods, ranging from matching and flexible outcome modeling to semiparametric estimation and ensemble approaches.While there was broad consensus on the topline estimate, there were also large differences in estimated treatment effect moderation.This highlights the fact that estimating varying treatment effects in observational studies is often more challenging than estimating the average treatment effect alone.We suggest several directions for future work arising from this workshop.
Key concepts: Observational study, Causal inference, Randomized experiment, Econometrics, Matching (statistics), Average treatment effect, Treatment effect, Scale (ratio)