2019QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)Requires access

Beyond ‘love-hate’ stereotype: Reflecting on the new dimension(s) of relationship between public relations and journalism in the ‘post-truth’ era

Jenny Zhengye Hou

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Considerable research has for long characterised the relationship between public relations and journalism using a ‘ love - hate ’ motif . On one hand, journalists have increasingly relied on public relations leads, contacts and content. On the other hand, journalists have been continually concerned , even to the extent of hostility, about the sheer volume of public relations information and its manipulative intent (Macnamara, 2015) . In the digital age, the prevalence of ‘ fake news ’, either derived from algorithms based on economic interests or constructed by individuals through social media, present s new threats to both professions being able to maintain integrity and authenticity of news production. Despite the common challenge of declining public trust and reputation risk to both journalism and public relations (Allcott & Gentzkow, 2017) , little research has interrogated and reflected on how the relationship between them has evolved

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Considerable research has for long characterised the relationship between public relations and journalism using a ‘ love - hate ’ motif . On one hand, journalists have increasingly relied on public relations leads, contacts and content. On the other hand, journalists have been continually concerned , even to the extent of hostility, about the sheer volume of public relations information and its manipulative intent (Macnamara, 2015) . In the digital age, the prevalence of ‘ fake news ’, either derived from algorithms based on economic interests or constructed by individuals through social media, present s new threats to both professions being able to maintain integrity and authenticity of news production. Despite the common challenge of declining public trust and reputation risk to both journalism and public relations (Allcott & Gentzkow, 2017) , little research has interrogated and reflected on how the relationship between them has evolved

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Considerable research has for long characterised the relationship between public relations and journalism using a ‘ love - hate ’ motif . On one hand, journalists have increasingly relied on public relations leads, contacts and content. On the other hand, journalists have been continually concerned , even to the extent of hostility, about the sheer volume of public relations information and its manipulative intent (Macnamara, 2015) . In the digital age, the prevalence of ‘ fake news ’, either derived from algorithms based on economic interests or constructed by individuals through social media, present s new threats to both professions being able to maintain integrity and authenticity of news production. Despite the common challenge of declining public trust and reputation risk to both journalism and public relations (Allcott & Gentzkow, 2017) , little research has interrogated and reflected on how the relationship between them has evolved

Key concepts: Journalism, Reputation, Public relations, Objectivity (philosophy), Hostility, Social media, Political science, Social psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Beyond ‘love-hate’ stereotype: Reflecting on the new dimension(s) of relationship between public relations and journalism in the ‘post-truth’ era — Research Paper | ScholarLens