2018Unpublished venueRequires access

Cognitive approaches to grammar in context

Vyvyan Evans, Melanie Green

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter presents some explicit comparisons between cognitive, generative and functional-typological approaches to grammar. It compares by setting out the assumptions, aims and methodology adopted by each of the three broad traditions, and by comparing the models according to these parameters. The chapter presents an overview of the characteristics of generative approaches to grammar. It describes Transformational Grammar and Kay and Fillmore&s;s Construction Grammar as extreme poles on a continuum of &s;broadly generative&s; theories, given the substantial differences between them. The chapter presents a comparative discussion of cognitive and generative approaches to core issues in the study of grammar, including word classes, constituency, grammatical functions and case, and tense, aspect, mood and voice. In the cognitive model, generalisations result from recurring patterns of usage that enable the speaker to arrive at a &s;higher-order&s; schema. In Cognitive Grammar, component structures are described as immanent in the complex grammatical construction, regardless of whether the compositionality is recognised by the speaker.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter presents some explicit comparisons between cognitive, generative and functional-typological approaches to grammar. It compares by setting out the assumptions, aims and methodology adopted by each of the three broad traditions, and by comparing the models according to these parameters. The chapter presents an overview of the characteristics of generative approaches to grammar. It describes Transformational Grammar and Kay and Fillmore&s;s Construction Grammar as extreme poles on a continuum of &s;broadly generative&s; theories, given the substantial differences between them. The chapter presents a comparative discussion of cognitive and generative approaches to core issues in the study of grammar, including word classes, constituency, grammatical functions and case, and tense, aspect, mood and voice. In the cognitive model, generalisations result from recurring patterns of usage that enable the speaker to arrive at a &s;higher-order&s; schema. In Cognitive Grammar, component structures are described as immanent in the complex grammatical construction, regardless of whether the compositionality is recognised by the speaker.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter presents some explicit comparisons between cognitive, generative and functional-typological approaches to grammar. It compares by setting out the assumptions, aims and methodology adopted by each of the three broad traditions, and by comparing the models according to these parameters. The chapter presents an overview of the characteristics of generative approaches to grammar. It describes Transformational Grammar and Kay and Fillmore&s;s Construction Grammar as extreme poles on a continuum of &s;broadly generative&s; theories, given the substantial differences between them. The chapter presents a comparative discussion of cognitive and generative approaches to core issues in the study of grammar, including word classes, constituency, grammatical functions and case, and tense, aspect, mood and voice. In the cognitive model, generalisations result from recurring patterns of usage that enable the speaker to arrive at a &s;higher-order&s; schema. In Cognitive Grammar, component structures are described as immanent in the complex grammatical construction, regardless of whether the compositionality is recognised by the speaker.

Key concepts: Cognitive grammar, Grammar, Cognition, Context (archaeology), Computer science, Linguistics, Cognitive science, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cognitive approaches to grammar in context — Research Paper | ScholarLens