2019Zavarivanje i zavarene konstrukcijeOpen access

Oxy-Fuel cutting: Automation makes the difference

Kurt Nachbargauer

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Like laser and water jet cutting, plasma cutting is today a highly automated process. However, the situation is different when it comes to Oxy-Fuel cutting. Over the past few years it has become seemingly less attractive than the other cutting processes and there is a general reluctance to use it. Could the reason for this be perhaps, that the process is generally far less likely to be automated? Each cutting method has the application for which it is best suited. Whereas laser is best for thin sheets, water jet is best for special materials where you need to avoid adding heat and plasma cutting is very good with stainless steel and for small contours. Oxy-Fuel is best suited for cutting carbon steel plate thicker than about 20mm and for cutting many identical parts. The automation of plasma cutting systems has grown enormously over the last 10 years, mainly due to the innovative approach of the manufacturers of the plasma cutting systems. Oxy-Fuel cutting is by far the oldest cutting method; everyone knows this. However, a lot of training is needed before you can become an Oxy-Fuel cutting expert and much experience gained over time is necessary to make the perfect cut every time. Oxy-Fuel cutting is in fact perhaps the most sophisticated cutting process. The question is how can this knowledge be integrated into an automated system? Because automating the cutting process is surely the key to restore the attractiveness of Oxy-Fuel cutting. Personnel costs will be significantly reduced by adding automation and it will at the same time, increase production quality and safety. All these things have a major impact on overall productivity of the Oxy-Fuel cutting process.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Like laser and water jet cutting, plasma cutting is today a highly automated process. However, the situation is different when it comes to Oxy-Fuel cutting. Over the past few years it has become seemingly less attractive than the other cutting processes and there is a general reluctance to use it. Could the reason for this be perhaps, that the process is generally far less likely to be automated? Each cutting method has the application for which it is best suited. Whereas laser is best for thin sheets, water jet is best for special materials where you need to avoid adding heat and plasma cutting is very good with stainless steel and for small contours. Oxy-Fuel is best suited for cutting carbon steel plate thicker than about 20mm and for cutting many identical parts. The automation of plasma cutting systems has grown enormously over the last 10 years, mainly due to the innovative approach of the manufacturers of the plasma cutting systems. Oxy-Fuel cutting is by far the oldest cutting method; everyone knows this. However, a lot of training is needed before you can become an Oxy-Fuel cutting expert and much experience gained over time is necessary to make the perfect cut every time. Oxy-Fuel cutting is in fact perhaps the most sophisticated cutting process. The question is how can this knowledge be integrated into an automated system? Because automating the cutting process is surely the key to restore the attractiveness of Oxy-Fuel cutting. Personnel costs will be significantly reduced by adding automation and it will at the same time, increase production quality and safety. All these things have a major impact on overall productivity of the Oxy-Fuel cutting process.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Like laser and water jet cutting, plasma cutting is today a highly automated process. However, the situation is different when it comes to Oxy-Fuel cutting. Over the past few years it has become seemingly less attractive than the other cutting processes and there is a general reluctance to use it. Could the reason for this be perhaps, that the process is generally far less likely to be automated? Each cutting method has the application for which it is best suited. Whereas laser is best for thin sheets, water jet is best for special materials where you need to avoid adding heat and plasma cutting is very good with stainless steel and for small contours. Oxy-Fuel is best suited for cutting carbon steel plate thicker than about 20mm and for cutting many identical parts. The automation of plasma cutting systems has grown enormously over the last 10 years, mainly due to the innovative approach of the manufacturers of the plasma cutting systems. Oxy-Fuel cutting is by far the oldest cutting method; everyone knows this. However, a lot of training is needed before you can become an Oxy-Fuel cutting expert and much experience gained over time is necessary to make the perfect cut every time. Oxy-Fuel cutting is in fact perhaps the most sophisticated cutting process. The question is how can this knowledge be integrated into an automated system? Because automating the cutting process is surely the key to restore the attractiveness of Oxy-Fuel cutting. Personnel costs will be significantly reduced by adding automation and it will at the same time, increase production quality and safety. All these things have a major impact on overall productivity of the Oxy-Fuel cutting process.

Key concepts: Plasma cutting, Laser cutting, Automation, Process (computing), Mechanical engineering, Computer science, Engineering drawing, Manufacturing engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Oxy-Fuel cutting: Automation makes the difference — Research Paper | ScholarLens