Assessment of people’s livelihood vulnerability under the impact of drought in Krongno district, Dak Nong province using livelihood vulnerability index
Xuan Thanh Tran, Khoi Nguyen Dao
Abstract
Open-access reader
Xuan Thanh Tran, Khoi Nguyen Dao
Abstract
Open-access reader
Krong No was evaluated that it was the most severely affected district in Dak Nong province under impacts of drought in 2015-2016. The objective of this study was to assess the people’s livelihood vulnerability in Krong No district in Daknong province by using Livelihood Vulnerability Index developed by Hahn et al. (2009) and field survey. The obtained results indicated that LVI of Krong No district reached to medium level (0.444). However, there was an unbalance point in major components of the LVI. The most vulnerable components were water (0.774) livelihood strategies (0.661), whereas, five other components were lower than 0.5. The descreasing order of the vulnerability was food, drought, social networks, health and sociodemographic profile. Another result showed that Quang Phu and Nam N'dir were two of five communes which were needed the support.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Krong No was evaluated that it was the most severely affected district in Dak Nong province under impacts of drought in 2015-2016. The objective of this study was to assess the people’s livelihood vulnerability in Krong No district in Daknong province by using Livelihood Vulnerability Index developed by Hahn et al. (2009) and field survey. The obtained results indicated that LVI of Krong No district reached to medium level (0.444). However, there was an unbalance point in major components of the LVI. The most vulnerable components were water (0.774) livelihood strategies (0.661), whereas, five other components were lower than 0.5. The descreasing order of the vulnerability was food, drought, social networks, health and sociodemographic profile. Another result showed that Quang Phu and Nam N'dir were two of five communes which were needed the support.
Key concepts: Livelihood, Vulnerability (computing), Vulnerability index, Geography, Index (typography), Socioeconomics, Vulnerability assessment, Agriculture