Evidence-based care system design – part 2. Systems within systems
John D. Dean
Abstract
Open-access reader
John D. Dean
Abstract
Open-access reader
In the previous edition of Future Healthcare Journal , there was a focus on using a systems engineering approach to healthcare design and improvement.1 Review articles highlighted the development of this approach in healthcare, with both concept translation into a framework, the approach in patient safety, training requirements, and application in international settings. In this edition we get down to more of the ‘brass tacks’ with a number of very concrete examples of applying a systems approach to care redesign. Commonly changes and innovations in healthcare delivery are based on ‘a good idea’, or perceived best practice that may have a varying level of evidence to support it, or are pragmatic because of a pressing need. Evaluation is key, but not easy, particularly as by its very …
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In the previous edition of Future Healthcare Journal , there was a focus on using a systems engineering approach to healthcare design and improvement.1 Review articles highlighted the development of this approach in healthcare, with both concept translation into a framework, the approach in patient safety, training requirements, and application in international settings. In this edition we get down to more of the ‘brass tacks’ with a number of very concrete examples of applying a systems approach to care redesign. Commonly changes and innovations in healthcare delivery are based on ‘a good idea’, or perceived best practice that may have a varying level of evidence to support it, or are pragmatic because of a pressing need. Evaluation is key, but not easy, particularly as by its very …
Key concepts: Systems design, Computer science, Systems engineering, Engineering, Software engineering