2001•Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

United Nations Peace Operations and the Brahimi Report

Lilland, Jon B.

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to assess the Brahimi Report focused specifically on the question if the recommendations of the Panel will make the United Nations again a credible peace operations organization, given the challenges of the future. The scope of this research is the peacekeeping part of a nation building effort that is executed by military forces. The paper defines the future challenge as complex peacekeeping in failing or failed states. It discusses the Report's recommendations concerning peacekeeping doctrine and strategy, mission planning, including mandate, troop levels, unity of effort and communications with troop contributing nations, intelligence, quality of forces and readiness and UN Headquarters support. The analysis is done by comparing the recommendations with lessons learned in similar operations, and the U.S. and NATO Peacekeeping and Peace Support Operations doctrines.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this paper is to assess the Brahimi Report focused specifically on the question if the recommendations of the Panel will make the United Nations again a credible peace operations organization, given the challenges of the future. The scope of this research is the peacekeeping part of a nation building effort that is executed by military forces. The paper defines the future challenge as complex peacekeeping in failing or failed states. It discusses the Report's recommendations concerning peacekeeping doctrine and strategy, mission planning, including mandate, troop levels, unity of effort and communications with troop contributing nations, intelligence, quality of forces and readiness and UN Headquarters support. The analysis is done by comparing the recommendations with lessons learned in similar operations, and the U.S. and NATO Peacekeeping and Peace Support Operations doctrines.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this paper is to assess the Brahimi Report focused specifically on the question if the recommendations of the Panel will make the United Nations again a credible peace operations organization, given the challenges of the future. The scope of this research is the peacekeeping part of a nation building effort that is executed by military forces. The paper defines the future challenge as complex peacekeeping in failing or failed states. It discusses the Report's recommendations concerning peacekeeping doctrine and strategy, mission planning, including mandate, troop levels, unity of effort and communications with troop contributing nations, intelligence, quality of forces and readiness and UN Headquarters support. The analysis is done by comparing the recommendations with lessons learned in similar operations, and the U.S. and NATO Peacekeeping and Peace Support Operations doctrines.

Key concepts: Peacekeeping, Mandate, Scope (computer science), Political science, Doctrine, Public administration, International peace, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
United Nations Peace Operations and the Brahimi Report — Research Paper | ScholarLens