2019Philosophy CompassRequires access

Nontraditional arguments for theism

C. A. McIntosh

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Abstract I propose a taxonomy of arguments for the existence of God and survey those categories of arguments I identify as nontraditional. I conclude with two general observations about theistic arguments, followed by suggestions for going forward.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract I propose a taxonomy of arguments for the existence of God and survey those categories of arguments I identify as nontraditional. I conclude with two general observations about theistic arguments, followed by suggestions for going forward.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract I propose a taxonomy of arguments for the existence of God and survey those categories of arguments I identify as nontraditional. I conclude with two general observations about theistic arguments, followed by suggestions for going forward.

Key concepts: Theism, Epistemology, Philosophy, Taxonomy (biology), Ecology, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nontraditional arguments for theism — Research Paper | ScholarLens