2019Journal of the Royal Society of New ZealandOpen access

Urban forest restoration ecology: a review from Hamilton, New Zealand

Kiri Joy Wallace, Bruce D. Clarkson

Open full text 50 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Restoration of urban forest improves quality of life for city residents and is important for boosting native biodiversity. However, the scientific knowledge required to inform successful restoration is largely lacking for urban forest ecosystems, which differ from rural forests. Here we review two decades of urban forest restoration research in Hamilton, New Zealand and summarise key findings across seven major ecological topics: i. species traits, filters and thresholds, ii. species richness and target ecosystems, iii. tree regeneration, iv. seed banks and seed rain, v. seed predation, vi. enrichment planting and vii. restored forest function. We then discuss general urban restoration principles that increase the efficacy of urban restoration efforts including restore to a minimum of 10% indigenous cover in cities, develop a step‐wise restoration plan and prioritise partner engagement. The purpose of this review is to aid urban forest restoration across New Zealand and globally.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT Restoration of urban forest improves quality of life for city residents and is important for boosting native biodiversity. However, the scientific knowledge required to inform successful restoration is largely lacking for urban forest ecosystems, which differ from rural forests. Here we review two decades of urban forest restoration research in Hamilton, New Zealand and summarise key findings across seven major ecological topics: i. species traits, filters and thresholds, ii. species richness and target ecosystems, iii. tree regeneration, iv. seed banks and seed rain, v. seed predation, vi. enrichment planting and vii. restored forest function. We then discuss general urban restoration principles that increase the efficacy of urban restoration efforts including restore to a minimum of 10% indigenous cover in cities, develop a step‐wise restoration plan and prioritise partner engagement. The purpose of this review is to aid urban forest restoration across New Zealand and globally.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 50 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT Restoration of urban forest improves quality of life for city residents and is important for boosting native biodiversity. However, the scientific knowledge required to inform successful restoration is largely lacking for urban forest ecosystems, which differ from rural forests. Here we review two decades of urban forest restoration research in Hamilton, New Zealand and summarise key findings across seven major ecological topics: i. species traits, filters and thresholds, ii. species richness and target ecosystems, iii. tree regeneration, iv. seed banks and seed rain, v. seed predation, vi. enrichment planting and vii. restored forest function. We then discuss general urban restoration principles that increase the efficacy of urban restoration efforts including restore to a minimum of 10% indigenous cover in cities, develop a step‐wise restoration plan and prioritise partner engagement. The purpose of this review is to aid urban forest restoration across New Zealand and globally.

Key concepts: Urban forest, Restoration ecology, Forest restoration, Geography, Biodiversity, Ecology, Urban forestry, Species richness

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Urban forest restoration ecology: a review from Hamilton, New Zealand — Research Paper | ScholarLens