Transforming the Firm through the Co‐evolution of Resources and Scope
Álvaro Cuervo-Cazurra
Abstract
Álvaro Cuervo-Cazurra
Abstract
The analysis of the competitive advantage of the firm is at the core of strategic management. There is a large body of literature that analyzes the relationship between a firm's characteristics and its advantage over other companies, trying to identify the firm factors that are most likely to be associated with superior performance as the embodiment of its competitive advantage. This type of analysis has led to the division of the field into two camps: the resource-based view of strategy, which views resources and their underlying imperfections in input markets as the most important factors (Penrose, 1959; Wernerfelt, 1984), and the positioning school or activity-based view of strategy, which views activities and their associated imperfections in product markets as the most important factors (Ansoff, 1965; Porter 1980, 1985). This divide among researchers is not likely to be solved unless we understand the processes that link resources and activities by which companies arrive at their competitive advantage.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The analysis of the competitive advantage of the firm is at the core of strategic management. There is a large body of literature that analyzes the relationship between a firm's characteristics and its advantage over other companies, trying to identify the firm factors that are most likely to be associated with superior performance as the embodiment of its competitive advantage. This type of analysis has led to the division of the field into two camps: the resource-based view of strategy, which views resources and their underlying imperfections in input markets as the most important factors (Penrose, 1959; Wernerfelt, 1984), and the positioning school or activity-based view of strategy, which views activities and their associated imperfections in product markets as the most important factors (Ansoff, 1965; Porter 1980, 1985). This divide among researchers is not likely to be solved unless we understand the processes that link resources and activities by which companies arrive at their competitive advantage.
Key concepts: Competitive advantage, Scope (computer science), Industrial organization, Resource-based view, Business, Resource (disambiguation), Product (mathematics), Strategic management