Analysis of co-authorship network based on some betweenness centrality concepts
R. Sunil Kumar, Divya Sindhu Lekha, Kannan Balakrishnan
Abstract
R. Sunil Kumar, Divya Sindhu Lekha, Kannan Balakrishnan
Abstract
Reliant components of a network are the connector nodes which aid in establishing a strongly connected network. Betweenness centrality of a node well captures its connecting capability. We suggest some new betweenness centrality measures which could be useful in analysing the structural connectivity of a network. In this paper we study the behaviour of collaboration in a co-authorship network, namely the NetScience network, from the perspective of these measures. We analyse the network from a micro perspective, where we consider small groups of scientists doing research in a common subdiscipline. We show that each group is formed by the influence of only one or two highly collaborating authors. Another speculation was that even though these authors are highly influential in smaller groups they do not possess notable contribution to the overall research of main discipline.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Reliant components of a network are the connector nodes which aid in establishing a strongly connected network. Betweenness centrality of a node well captures its connecting capability. We suggest some new betweenness centrality measures which could be useful in analysing the structural connectivity of a network. In this paper we study the behaviour of collaboration in a co-authorship network, namely the NetScience network, from the perspective of these measures. We analyse the network from a micro perspective, where we consider small groups of scientists doing research in a common subdiscipline. We show that each group is formed by the influence of only one or two highly collaborating authors. Another speculation was that even though these authors are highly influential in smaller groups they do not possess notable contribution to the overall research of main discipline.
Key concepts: Betweenness centrality, Centrality, Computer science, Network analysis, Network theory, Mathematics, Engineering, Statistics