2016HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Open access

Experiments in animal farming practice: the case of decreasing the use of antimicrobials in livestock (France)

Nathalie Joly, Cécile Adam, Florence Bonnet-Beaugrand, J. Defois, Christian Ducrot, Nicolas Fortané, Brigitte Frappat, A. Gros, F. Hellec, Claire Manoli, Mathilde Paul, Axelle Poizat, C. Samedi

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Many farmers are engaged in activities that can be considered as experiments, but until recently few of their practices were studied. This paper offers a first characterization of experiments by dairy, pig and poultry farmers working in organic, labelled or conventional systems. Data (40 interviews) were collected during an interdisciplinary research project on antibiotic use in livestock farming in France. First, we discuss the literature. In line with D.A. Schön’s “reflective practitioner model”, we agree that farmers mainly carry out informal experiments. Second, we provide an overview of the experimental process (type of farmer’s experiment (FE), period, topics, targets and length) and the outcomes (efficiency, transfer, possible impact on antimicrobials use, renewal), drawing on farmers’ subjective valuation and qualitative interview data. We find that farmers carry out multiple tests, mainly with alternative medicines. There is a clear tendency of transferring positive tests for a given pathology to one another. Third, we present seven portraits of farmers to shed light on complementary dimensions of experiments: the appeal of novelty, the role of vets and technicians, and the role of farmers groups and training. Finally, we argue that much can be learned from ethnographic investigation in order to grasp what farmers are experiencing when they endeavour to solve animal health problems.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Many farmers are engaged in activities that can be considered as experiments, but until recently few of their practices were studied. This paper offers a first characterization of experiments by dairy, pig and poultry farmers working in organic, labelled or conventional systems. Data (40 interviews) were collected during an interdisciplinary research project on antibiotic use in livestock farming in France. First, we discuss the literature. In line with D.A. Schön’s “reflective practitioner model”, we agree that farmers mainly carry out informal experiments. Second, we provide an overview of the experimental process (type of farmer’s experiment (FE), period, topics, targets and length) and the outcomes (efficiency, transfer, possible impact on antimicrobials use, renewal), drawing on farmers’ subjective valuation and qualitative interview data. We find that farmers carry out multiple tests, mainly with alternative medicines. There is a clear tendency of transferring positive tests for a given pathology to one another. Third, we present seven portraits of farmers to shed light on complementary dimensions of experiments: the appeal of novelty, the role of vets and technicians, and the role of farmers groups and training. Finally, we argue that much can be learned from ethnographic investigation in order to grasp what farmers are experiencing when they endeavour to solve animal health problems.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Many farmers are engaged in activities that can be considered as experiments, but until recently few of their practices were studied. This paper offers a first characterization of experiments by dairy, pig and poultry farmers working in organic, labelled or conventional systems. Data (40 interviews) were collected during an interdisciplinary research project on antibiotic use in livestock farming in France. First, we discuss the literature. In line with D.A. Schön’s “reflective practitioner model”, we agree that farmers mainly carry out informal experiments. Second, we provide an overview of the experimental process (type of farmer’s experiment (FE), period, topics, targets and length) and the outcomes (efficiency, transfer, possible impact on antimicrobials use, renewal), drawing on farmers’ subjective valuation and qualitative interview data. We find that farmers carry out multiple tests, mainly with alternative medicines. There is a clear tendency of transferring positive tests for a given pathology to one another. Third, we present seven portraits of farmers to shed light on complementary dimensions of experiments: the appeal of novelty, the role of vets and technicians, and the role of farmers groups and training. Finally, we argue that much can be learned from ethnographic investigation in order to grasp what farmers are experiencing when they endeavour to solve animal health problems.

Key concepts: Livestock, Agriculture, Antimicrobial, Business, Agricultural science, Agroforestry, Environmental science, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Experiments in animal farming practice: the case of decreasing the use of antimicrobials in livestock (France) — Research Paper | ScholarLens