2017Unpublished venueRequires access

Should interest rates be regulated or abolished? The case for the abolition of usury

Joanne Lee

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

This article makes the normative case against usury, defined in the article as any interest on a loan. It argues that usury legitimises bondage of the borrower to the lender through debt. Based on this radicalised understanding of usury, it is further argued that usury facilitates debt accumulation, as well as fosters irresponsible lending and borrowing. It considers the counter-arguments of moral hazard, adverse selection and efficiency, concluding that it remains that the better view is that usury should be prohibited altogether. The article proposes a law to criminalise usury, as well as critically examining this proposed law and its rationale.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article makes the normative case against usury, defined in the article as any interest on a loan. It argues that usury legitimises bondage of the borrower to the lender through debt. Based on this radicalised understanding of usury, it is further argued that usury facilitates debt accumulation, as well as fosters irresponsible lending and borrowing. It considers the counter-arguments of moral hazard, adverse selection and efficiency, concluding that it remains that the better view is that usury should be prohibited altogether. The article proposes a law to criminalise usury, as well as critically examining this proposed law and its rationale.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article makes the normative case against usury, defined in the article as any interest on a loan. It argues that usury legitimises bondage of the borrower to the lender through debt. Based on this radicalised understanding of usury, it is further argued that usury facilitates debt accumulation, as well as fosters irresponsible lending and borrowing. It considers the counter-arguments of moral hazard, adverse selection and efficiency, concluding that it remains that the better view is that usury should be prohibited altogether. The article proposes a law to criminalise usury, as well as critically examining this proposed law and its rationale.

Key concepts: Usury, Debt, Moral hazard, Loan, Economics, Law and economics, Normative, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Should interest rates be regulated or abolished? The case for the abolition of usury — Research Paper | ScholarLens