2012Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparison of clinical and laboratorial method in diagnosis of trichomonas vaginitis.

Maliheh Dormohamadi, Nahid Golmakani

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Trichomonas vaginalis is the third prevalent cause of vaginitis. Because of lack of precise diagnosing methods and the similarity of its symptoms with other STD, diagnosis of trichomoniasis is not an easy effort. Valid resources pointed out that diagnosis of trichomonas vaginitis merely based on clinical signs is not possible, but on the basis of the test results. Thereupon, this research is accomplished to compare clinical and laboratorial methods in diagnosis of trichomonas vaginitis.Methods: This observational research was accomplished on 550 women with vaginitis infection. Eligible women with signs of vaginitis infection were examined and sample of vaginal discharge taken for wet smear testing. Data were gathered by means of interviews and observation forms, and analyzed by SPSS software version 14.5 and descriptive statistics. Results: The tests performed on 550 patients suffering from vaginal infection shows that 54 cases of trichomoniasis were positive. According to the clinical observation of the subjects, 14.54 had infection; while on the basis of microscopic diagnosis 9.81 were trichomonas positive. 10.18 of the patients that were trichomonas positive in clinical observation, their microscopic observation result were negative. The result of investigations indicated that, 5.45 that were trichomonas negative in clinical observation, were positive in microscopic observation. Conclusion: Lake of application of laboratorial method in identifying vaginitis patients may lead to incorrect diagnosis, so it is suggested to utilize laboratorial results in precise diagnosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction: Trichomonas vaginalis is the third prevalent cause of vaginitis. Because of lack of precise diagnosing methods and the similarity of its symptoms with other STD, diagnosis of trichomoniasis is not an easy effort. Valid resources pointed out that diagnosis of trichomonas vaginitis merely based on clinical signs is not possible, but on the basis of the test results. Thereupon, this research is accomplished to compare clinical and laboratorial methods in diagnosis of trichomonas vaginitis.Methods: This observational research was accomplished on 550 women with vaginitis infection. Eligible women with signs of vaginitis infection were examined and sample of vaginal discharge taken for wet smear testing. Data were gathered by means of interviews and observation forms, and analyzed by SPSS software version 14.5 and descriptive statistics. Results: The tests performed on 550 patients suffering from vaginal infection shows that 54 cases of trichomoniasis were positive. According to the clinical observation of the subjects, 14.54 had infection; while on the basis of microscopic diagnosis 9.81 were trichomonas positive. 10.18 of the patients that were trichomonas positive in clinical observation, their microscopic observation result were negative. The result of investigations indicated that, 5.45 that were trichomonas negative in clinical observation, were positive in microscopic observation. Conclusion: Lake of application of laboratorial method in identifying vaginitis patients may lead to incorrect diagnosis, so it is suggested to utilize laboratorial results in precise diagnosis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction: Trichomonas vaginalis is the third prevalent cause of vaginitis. Because of lack of precise diagnosing methods and the similarity of its symptoms with other STD, diagnosis of trichomoniasis is not an easy effort. Valid resources pointed out that diagnosis of trichomonas vaginitis merely based on clinical signs is not possible, but on the basis of the test results. Thereupon, this research is accomplished to compare clinical and laboratorial methods in diagnosis of trichomonas vaginitis.Methods: This observational research was accomplished on 550 women with vaginitis infection. Eligible women with signs of vaginitis infection were examined and sample of vaginal discharge taken for wet smear testing. Data were gathered by means of interviews and observation forms, and analyzed by SPSS software version 14.5 and descriptive statistics. Results: The tests performed on 550 patients suffering from vaginal infection shows that 54 cases of trichomoniasis were positive. According to the clinical observation of the subjects, 14.54 had infection; while on the basis of microscopic diagnosis 9.81 were trichomonas positive. 10.18 of the patients that were trichomonas positive in clinical observation, their microscopic observation result were negative. The result of investigations indicated that, 5.45 that were trichomonas negative in clinical observation, were positive in microscopic observation. Conclusion: Lake of application of laboratorial method in identifying vaginitis patients may lead to incorrect diagnosis, so it is suggested to utilize laboratorial results in precise diagnosis.

Key concepts: Trichomoniasis, Vaginitis, Trichomonas, Trichomonas Vaginitis, Trichomonas vaginalis, Medicine, Gynecology, Clinical diagnosis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of clinical and laboratorial method in diagnosis of trichomonas vaginitis. — Research Paper | ScholarLens