Factors Influencing Decision-Making in Prenatal Screening for Down Syndrome
Anna E. Bauer
Abstract
Open-access reader
Anna E. Bauer
Abstract
Open-access reader
Objectives: This paper aims to determine what factors pregnant women and their partners use to determine whether to undergo prenatal screening for Down syndrome, and what further information they need to make informed decisions. Methods: Medical and social science databases were used to identify articles related to uptake of prenatal screening for Down syndrome and decision-making. Results: The majority of studies were qualitative survey or interview studies. Factors that influenced decisions included preexisting risk, anxiety, ability for action, personal values, disability experiences, demographic characteristics, family and friends, medical providers, trust in the medical establishment, and norms around routine care. Conclusions: As prenatal screening improves decision-making factors must be considered when providing information to ensure informed decision-making. Policy discussions should include multiple stakeholders, including women and their partners, medical professionals, genetic counselors, families affected by disability, and people with Down syndrome. Policies and practices must ultimately support both the reproductive rights of women and adequate, nonstigmatizing services for children.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objectives: This paper aims to determine what factors pregnant women and their partners use to determine whether to undergo prenatal screening for Down syndrome, and what further information they need to make informed decisions. Methods: Medical and social science databases were used to identify articles related to uptake of prenatal screening for Down syndrome and decision-making. Results: The majority of studies were qualitative survey or interview studies. Factors that influenced decisions included preexisting risk, anxiety, ability for action, personal values, disability experiences, demographic characteristics, family and friends, medical providers, trust in the medical establishment, and norms around routine care. Conclusions: As prenatal screening improves decision-making factors must be considered when providing information to ensure informed decision-making. Policy discussions should include multiple stakeholders, including women and their partners, medical professionals, genetic counselors, families affected by disability, and people with Down syndrome. Policies and practices must ultimately support both the reproductive rights of women and adequate, nonstigmatizing services for children.
Key concepts: Medicine, Computer science