2019•Unpublished venueRequires access

The Federal and State Court Systems

G. Alan Tarr

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The Supreme Court annually receives hundreds of petitions from prisoners claiming their trials were unfair and that they should be released. Thus, Clarence Earl Gideon’s petition, four pages painstakingly printed in pencil on lined paper, was hardly unique. Most prisoner petitions lack legal merit and are dismissed by the Court, the justices granted Gideon&s;s petition in order to consider whether the Constitution requires states to provide a defense attorney to poor defendants in criminal cases. Creation Political conflict over the structure of the federal judicial system began at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 and has erupted periodically ever since. For most of the nineteenth century, the structure of the federal judicial system remained unchanged. In 1891, Congress added a new set of courts, the circuit courts of appeals, to expand the capacity of the federal courts to hear appeals and to relieve caseload pressures on the Supreme Court.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Supreme Court annually receives hundreds of petitions from prisoners claiming their trials were unfair and that they should be released. Thus, Clarence Earl Gideon’s petition, four pages painstakingly printed in pencil on lined paper, was hardly unique. Most prisoner petitions lack legal merit and are dismissed by the Court, the justices granted Gideon&s;s petition in order to consider whether the Constitution requires states to provide a defense attorney to poor defendants in criminal cases. Creation Political conflict over the structure of the federal judicial system began at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 and has erupted periodically ever since. For most of the nineteenth century, the structure of the federal judicial system remained unchanged. In 1891, Congress added a new set of courts, the circuit courts of appeals, to expand the capacity of the federal courts to hear appeals and to relieve caseload pressures on the Supreme Court.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Supreme Court annually receives hundreds of petitions from prisoners claiming their trials were unfair and that they should be released. Thus, Clarence Earl Gideon’s petition, four pages painstakingly printed in pencil on lined paper, was hardly unique. Most prisoner petitions lack legal merit and are dismissed by the Court, the justices granted Gideon&s;s petition in order to consider whether the Constitution requires states to provide a defense attorney to poor defendants in criminal cases. Creation Political conflict over the structure of the federal judicial system began at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 and has erupted periodically ever since. For most of the nineteenth century, the structure of the federal judicial system remained unchanged. In 1891, Congress added a new set of courts, the circuit courts of appeals, to expand the capacity of the federal courts to hear appeals and to relieve caseload pressures on the Supreme Court.

Key concepts: State (computer science), Federal state, Federal court, Political science, Law, Computer science, Public administration, Programming language

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Federal and State Court Systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens