1985Regional Anesthesia The Journal of Neural Blockade in Obstetrics Surgery & Pain ControlOpen access

Effect of Vasoconstrictor Agents on the Duration of Action of Intrathecal Tetracaine, Bupivacaine and Lidocaine in the Dog

Hal S. Feldman, Benjamín G. Covino

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Both epinephrine and phenylephrine are capable of prolonging the duration of anesthesia when added to solutions of tetracaine intended for intrathecal use. Conflicting data exist concerning the relative efficacy of vasoconstrictor agents added to lidocaine and bupivacaine solutions intended for intrathecal use. The present investigation was initiated to study the comparative efficacy of epinephrine and phenylephrine in combination with tetracaine, lidocaine, and bupivacaine employing a model for spinal anesthesia in the dog. The results indicate that epinephrine and phenylephrine are capable of significantly prolonging the duration of motor blockade induced by tetracaine in the dog. When compared to plain solutions, no significant prolongation of motor blockade was observed following intrathecal administration of either lidocaine or bupivacaine with epinephrine and phenylephrine.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Both epinephrine and phenylephrine are capable of prolonging the duration of anesthesia when added to solutions of tetracaine intended for intrathecal use. Conflicting data exist concerning the relative efficacy of vasoconstrictor agents added to lidocaine and bupivacaine solutions intended for intrathecal use. The present investigation was initiated to study the comparative efficacy of epinephrine and phenylephrine in combination with tetracaine, lidocaine, and bupivacaine employing a model for spinal anesthesia in the dog. The results indicate that epinephrine and phenylephrine are capable of significantly prolonging the duration of motor blockade induced by tetracaine in the dog. When compared to plain solutions, no significant prolongation of motor blockade was observed following intrathecal administration of either lidocaine or bupivacaine with epinephrine and phenylephrine.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Both epinephrine and phenylephrine are capable of prolonging the duration of anesthesia when added to solutions of tetracaine intended for intrathecal use. Conflicting data exist concerning the relative efficacy of vasoconstrictor agents added to lidocaine and bupivacaine solutions intended for intrathecal use. The present investigation was initiated to study the comparative efficacy of epinephrine and phenylephrine in combination with tetracaine, lidocaine, and bupivacaine employing a model for spinal anesthesia in the dog. The results indicate that epinephrine and phenylephrine are capable of significantly prolonging the duration of motor blockade induced by tetracaine in the dog. When compared to plain solutions, no significant prolongation of motor blockade was observed following intrathecal administration of either lidocaine or bupivacaine with epinephrine and phenylephrine.

Key concepts: Tetracaine, Phenylephrine, Lidocaine, Epinephrine, Bupivacaine, Anesthesia, Medicine, Blockade

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of Vasoconstrictor Agents on the Duration of Action of Intrathecal Tetracaine, Bupivacaine and Lidocaine in the Dog — Research Paper | ScholarLens