2019•Unpublished venueRequires access

Diversification Among Mainland Chinese Intellectuals

Lynn T. White, Cheng Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The bumpiness or "zigs and zags" of state policy might partly be measured in terms of fluctuating support for the process that creates "intellectuals," defined in Communist China&s;s standard way as people with some college education. Chinese intellectuals during the modernization reforms are increasingly differentiated. Although mainland Chinese thinkers have received moderately increasing official support in the decade after 1978, technical intellectuals have benefited more than humanists and social scientists. In mainland China, "red" and "expert" intellectuals were nurtured as different during the 1950s and 1960s—often trained for their political or technical roles in separate sets of schools. The health of Peking intellectuals, as surveyed in 1983 by the Chinese Medical Association, was also objectively worse than that of other residents. Mainland Chinese intellectuals differ on the extent to which they worry that Communist China may adopt Western cultural styles too broadly and reject traditional Chinese forms too quickly.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The bumpiness or "zigs and zags" of state policy might partly be measured in terms of fluctuating support for the process that creates "intellectuals," defined in Communist China&s;s standard way as people with some college education. Chinese intellectuals during the modernization reforms are increasingly differentiated. Although mainland Chinese thinkers have received moderately increasing official support in the decade after 1978, technical intellectuals have benefited more than humanists and social scientists. In mainland China, "red" and "expert" intellectuals were nurtured as different during the 1950s and 1960s—often trained for their political or technical roles in separate sets of schools. The health of Peking intellectuals, as surveyed in 1983 by the Chinese Medical Association, was also objectively worse than that of other residents. Mainland Chinese intellectuals differ on the extent to which they worry that Communist China may adopt Western cultural styles too broadly and reject traditional Chinese forms too quickly.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The bumpiness or "zigs and zags" of state policy might partly be measured in terms of fluctuating support for the process that creates "intellectuals," defined in Communist China&s;s standard way as people with some college education. Chinese intellectuals during the modernization reforms are increasingly differentiated. Although mainland Chinese thinkers have received moderately increasing official support in the decade after 1978, technical intellectuals have benefited more than humanists and social scientists. In mainland China, "red" and "expert" intellectuals were nurtured as different during the 1950s and 1960s—often trained for their political or technical roles in separate sets of schools. The health of Peking intellectuals, as surveyed in 1983 by the Chinese Medical Association, was also objectively worse than that of other residents. Mainland Chinese intellectuals differ on the extent to which they worry that Communist China may adopt Western cultural styles too broadly and reject traditional Chinese forms too quickly.

Key concepts: Diversification (marketing strategy), Mainland China, Mainland, Economic geography, Geography, Political science, Business, China

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diversification Among Mainland Chinese Intellectuals — Research Paper | ScholarLens