2019BiochemistryOpen access

Identification of Factors Complicating Bioluminescence Imaging

Hsien‐Wei Yeh, Tianchen Wu, Minghai Chen, Hui‐wang Ai

Open full text 42 citations

Abstract

In vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI) has become a standard, non-invasive imaging modality for following gene expression or the fate of proteins and cells in living animals. Currently, bioluminescent reporters used in laboratories are mostly derivatives of two major luciferase families: ATP-dependent insect luciferases and ATP-independent marine luciferases. Inconsistent results of experiments using different bioluminescent reporters, such as Akaluc and Antareas2, have been reported. Herein, we re-examined the inconsistency in several experimental settings and identified the factors, such as ATP dependency, stability in serum, and molecular sizes of luciferases, that contributed to the observed differences. We expect this study will make the research community aware of these factors and facilitate more accurate interpretation of BLI data by considering the nature of each bioluminescent reporter.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI) has become a standard, non-invasive imaging modality for following gene expression or the fate of proteins and cells in living animals. Currently, bioluminescent reporters used in laboratories are mostly derivatives of two major luciferase families: ATP-dependent insect luciferases and ATP-independent marine luciferases. Inconsistent results of experiments using different bioluminescent reporters, such as Akaluc and Antareas2, have been reported. Herein, we re-examined the inconsistency in several experimental settings and identified the factors, such as ATP dependency, stability in serum, and molecular sizes of luciferases, that contributed to the observed differences. We expect this study will make the research community aware of these factors and facilitate more accurate interpretation of BLI data by considering the nature of each bioluminescent reporter.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 42 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI) has become a standard, non-invasive imaging modality for following gene expression or the fate of proteins and cells in living animals. Currently, bioluminescent reporters used in laboratories are mostly derivatives of two major luciferase families: ATP-dependent insect luciferases and ATP-independent marine luciferases. Inconsistent results of experiments using different bioluminescent reporters, such as Akaluc and Antareas2, have been reported. Herein, we re-examined the inconsistency in several experimental settings and identified the factors, such as ATP dependency, stability in serum, and molecular sizes of luciferases, that contributed to the observed differences. We expect this study will make the research community aware of these factors and facilitate more accurate interpretation of BLI data by considering the nature of each bioluminescent reporter.

Key concepts: Luciferases, Bioluminescence, Bioluminescence imaging, Luciferase, In vivo, Computational biology, Biology, Identification (biology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Identification of Factors Complicating Bioluminescence Imaging — Research Paper | ScholarLens