2003arXiv (Cornell University)Open access

Superbubbles vs Super-galactic winds

Guillermo Tenorio‐Tagle, Sergiy Silich, Casiana Muñoz-Tuñón

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

We stress some of the major differences between supergalactic winds and giant superbubbles evolving into the giant low density haloes of galaxies. We review major properties of bursts of star formation and the critical energy required for mass ejection both in the case of an ISM strongly flattened by rotation and that imposed by a more extended ISM distribution arising from a smaller rotation. The limits are thus establish for galaxies with an ISM mass in the range 10$^6$ M$_\odot$ to more than 10$^9$ M$_\odot$, and are compared with a sample of local galaxies. Some of these galaxies seem to be above the critical limit despite the fact that their structure is clearly that of a superbubble. True supergalactic winds, as evidence by M82, are shown to exceed the critical limit by more than an order of magnitude and thus the limit derived by Silich & Tenorio-Tagle (2001) for mass ejection should be regarded as a lower limit.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We stress some of the major differences between supergalactic winds and giant superbubbles evolving into the giant low density haloes of galaxies. We review major properties of bursts of star formation and the critical energy required for mass ejection both in the case of an ISM strongly flattened by rotation and that imposed by a more extended ISM distribution arising from a smaller rotation. The limits are thus establish for galaxies with an ISM mass in the range 10$^6$ M$_\odot$ to more than 10$^9$ M$_\odot$, and are compared with a sample of local galaxies. Some of these galaxies seem to be above the critical limit despite the fact that their structure is clearly that of a superbubble. True supergalactic winds, as evidence by M82, are shown to exceed the critical limit by more than an order of magnitude and thus the limit derived by Silich & Tenorio-Tagle (2001) for mass ejection should be regarded as a lower limit.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We stress some of the major differences between supergalactic winds and giant superbubbles evolving into the giant low density haloes of galaxies. We review major properties of bursts of star formation and the critical energy required for mass ejection both in the case of an ISM strongly flattened by rotation and that imposed by a more extended ISM distribution arising from a smaller rotation. The limits are thus establish for galaxies with an ISM mass in the range 10$^6$ M$_\odot$ to more than 10$^9$ M$_\odot$, and are compared with a sample of local galaxies. Some of these galaxies seem to be above the critical limit despite the fact that their structure is clearly that of a superbubble. True supergalactic winds, as evidence by M82, are shown to exceed the critical limit by more than an order of magnitude and thus the limit derived by Silich & Tenorio-Tagle (2001) for mass ejection should be regarded as a lower limit.

Key concepts: Superbubble, Galaxy, Physics, Astrophysics, Limit (mathematics), Star formation, Rotation (mathematics), Interstellar medium

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Superbubbles vs Super-galactic winds — Research Paper | ScholarLens