2019TransplantationRequires access

The Outcomes of Portal Vein Reconstruction With Vein Graft Interposition in Pediatric Liver Transplantation for Small Children With Biliary Atresia

Seisuke Sakamoto, Hajime Uchida, Toshihiro Kitajima, Seiichi Shimizu, Shohei Yoshimura, Masahiro Takeda, Yoshihiro Hirata, Akinari Fukuda, Mureo Kasahara

Open publisher page 35 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several technical modifications in portal vein (PV) reconstruction have shown excellent outcomes in pediatric liver transplantation (LT); however, which procedure is the best for PV reconstruction of the hypoplastic PV in pediatric LT remains unclear. METHODS: One hundred sixteen pediatric patients aged 1 or younger with biliary atresia (BA) undergoing living donor LT (LDLT) at our center were enrolled in the present study to investigate the outcomes of the different types of PV reconstruction. We compared the results between patients with and without vein graft (VG) interposition (VG group, n = 33; non-VG group, n = 83) to analyze the risk factors for PV complications (PVCs). The median follow-up period was 4.7 years. RESULTS: PVCs occurred in 10 cases (7.2%), including 5 cases in the non-VG group and 5 in the VG group. Stenosis and thrombosis occurred in 10 and 3 cases, respectively, and 3 cases suffered from both. Three patients were surgically treated for PVCs, and 2 underwent stent insertion to treat short-term recurrence after the initial treatment. The incidence of PVCs in the 2 groups did not differ to a statistically significant extent. Although retrograde PV flow was 1 of the significant risk factors in a univariate analysis, a multivariate analysis revealed that early transplant era was the only independent risk factor for PVCs. CONCLUSIONS: VG interposition for PV reconstruction in LDLT appears to be a feasible alternative option with acceptable outcomes for patients with BA. Achieving sufficient PV flow is essential to preventing PVCs after LDLT.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Several technical modifications in portal vein (PV) reconstruction have shown excellent outcomes in pediatric liver transplantation (LT); however, which procedure is the best for PV reconstruction of the hypoplastic PV in pediatric LT remains unclear. METHODS: One hundred sixteen pediatric patients aged 1 or younger with biliary atresia (BA) undergoing living donor LT (LDLT) at our center were enrolled in the present study to investigate the outcomes of the different types of PV reconstruction. We compared the results between patients with and without vein graft (VG) interposition (VG group, n = 33; non-VG group, n = 83) to analyze the risk factors for PV complications (PVCs). The median follow-up period was 4.7 years. RESULTS: PVCs occurred in 10 cases (7.2%), including 5 cases in the non-VG group and 5 in the VG group. Stenosis and thrombosis occurred in 10 and 3 cases, respectively, and 3 cases suffered from both. Three patients were surgically treated for PVCs, and 2 underwent stent insertion to treat short-term recurrence after the initial treatment. The incidence of PVCs in the 2 groups did not differ to a statistically significant extent. Although retrograde PV flow was 1 of the significant risk factors in a univariate analysis, a multivariate analysis revealed that early transplant era was the only independent risk factor for PVCs. CONCLUSIONS: VG interposition for PV reconstruction in LDLT appears to be a feasible alternative option with acceptable outcomes for patients with BA. Achieving sufficient PV flow is essential to preventing PVCs after LDLT.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Several technical modifications in portal vein (PV) reconstruction have shown excellent outcomes in pediatric liver transplantation (LT); however, which procedure is the best for PV reconstruction of the hypoplastic PV in pediatric LT remains unclear. METHODS: One hundred sixteen pediatric patients aged 1 or younger with biliary atresia (BA) undergoing living donor LT (LDLT) at our center were enrolled in the present study to investigate the outcomes of the different types of PV reconstruction. We compared the results between patients with and without vein graft (VG) interposition (VG group, n = 33; non-VG group, n = 83) to analyze the risk factors for PV complications (PVCs). The median follow-up period was 4.7 years. RESULTS: PVCs occurred in 10 cases (7.2%), including 5 cases in the non-VG group and 5 in the VG group. Stenosis and thrombosis occurred in 10 and 3 cases, respectively, and 3 cases suffered from both. Three patients were surgically treated for PVCs, and 2 underwent stent insertion to treat short-term recurrence after the initial treatment. The incidence of PVCs in the 2 groups did not differ to a statistically significant extent. Although retrograde PV flow was 1 of the significant risk factors in a univariate analysis, a multivariate analysis revealed that early transplant era was the only independent risk factor for PVCs. CONCLUSIONS: VG interposition for PV reconstruction in LDLT appears to be a feasible alternative option with acceptable outcomes for patients with BA. Achieving sufficient PV flow is essential to preventing PVCs after LDLT.

Key concepts: Medicine, Biliary atresia, Liver transplantation, Portal vein thrombosis, Surgery, Univariate analysis, Incidence (geometry), Atresia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Outcomes of Portal Vein Reconstruction With Vein Graft Interposition in Pediatric Liver Transplantation for Small Children With Biliary Atresia — Research Paper | ScholarLens