2016•Dutch CrossingRequires access

Beyond Spaces: Debunking the Public/Private Divide in Understanding Violence Against Women in India

Sreyashi Ghosh

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Purpose: One of the hallmarks of the second wave feminism was to recognise and popularise the public men/private women dichotomy that had never been explored by the preceding feminist schools for the fear of ‘politicising the private sphere’. The sanctity of the private sphere and its immunity from the outside world has been religiously maintained, which in turn manifested the private as the sphere of safety and non-encroachment. Violence within the private sphere hardly makes its way out of the four walls of the house for multiple reasons thus again confirming and upholding the notion that private sphere is relatively more tenable in comparison to the public domain while crimes committed in the public sphere are widely reported. But in this paper, the author tries to debunk the idea of gendering space (with relevant National Crime Record Bureau, India data) created to make women feel more secured in the private than in the public sphere. Methodology: With the help of the NCRB data the author first establishes a relationship between space and incidence of violence and put forward the argument that in actual reality victimization doesn’t have a spatial characteristic, though forms may differ. Results: The paper argues that the idea of space is a patriarchal product which not only jeopardizes the mobility of women between spaces but aggravates their vulnerability in general. Recommendations: De-gendering spaces- doing away with labelling of spaces- is therefore crucial to minimize victimisation of women in different spheres. Increasing visibility of the women in spaces can go a long to sensitize people by reducing the association of the private sphere with women and thus help in breaking the public/private dichotomy to a great extent. The myth of protective cocoon that domestic sphere is often associated has long been busted and as far as the assault in the public sphere is concerned it can be contained by the process of de-gendering. Violence, like ‘risk’ has the capability of transcending boundaries, therefore doing away with the concept of strict boundary can be regarded as a probable solution to contain violence in both the spheres. Keywords: Public/private dichotomy, gendering spaces, NCRB reports, patriarchy

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose: One of the hallmarks of the second wave feminism was to recognise and popularise the public men/private women dichotomy that had never been explored by the preceding feminist schools for the fear of ‘politicising the private sphere’. The sanctity of the private sphere and its immunity from the outside world has been religiously maintained, which in turn manifested the private as the sphere of safety and non-encroachment. Violence within the private sphere hardly makes its way out of the four walls of the house for multiple reasons thus again confirming and upholding the notion that private sphere is relatively more tenable in comparison to the public domain while crimes committed in the public sphere are widely reported. But in this paper, the author tries to debunk the idea of gendering space (with relevant National Crime Record Bureau, India data) created to make women feel more secured in the private than in the public sphere. Methodology: With the help of the NCRB data the author first establishes a relationship between space and incidence of violence and put forward the argument that in actual reality victimization doesn’t have a spatial characteristic, though forms may differ. Results: The paper argues that the idea of space is a patriarchal product which not only jeopardizes the mobility of women between spaces but aggravates their vulnerability in general. Recommendations: De-gendering spaces- doing away with labelling of spaces- is therefore crucial to minimize victimisation of women in different spheres. Increasing visibility of the women in spaces can go a long to sensitize people by reducing the association of the private sphere with women and thus help in breaking the public/private dichotomy to a great extent. The myth of protective cocoon that domestic sphere is often associated has long been busted and as far as the assault in the public sphere is concerned it can be contained by the process of de-gendering. Violence, like ‘risk’ has the capability of transcending boundaries, therefore doing away with the concept of strict boundary can be regarded as a probable solution to contain violence in both the spheres. Keywords: Public/private dichotomy, gendering spaces, NCRB reports, patriarchy

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose: One of the hallmarks of the second wave feminism was to recognise and popularise the public men/private women dichotomy that had never been explored by the preceding feminist schools for the fear of ‘politicising the private sphere’. The sanctity of the private sphere and its immunity from the outside world has been religiously maintained, which in turn manifested the private as the sphere of safety and non-encroachment. Violence within the private sphere hardly makes its way out of the four walls of the house for multiple reasons thus again confirming and upholding the notion that private sphere is relatively more tenable in comparison to the public domain while crimes committed in the public sphere are widely reported. But in this paper, the author tries to debunk the idea of gendering space (with relevant National Crime Record Bureau, India data) created to make women feel more secured in the private than in the public sphere. Methodology: With the help of the NCRB data the author first establishes a relationship between space and incidence of violence and put forward the argument that in actual reality victimization doesn’t have a spatial characteristic, though forms may differ. Results: The paper argues that the idea of space is a patriarchal product which not only jeopardizes the mobility of women between spaces but aggravates their vulnerability in general. Recommendations: De-gendering spaces- doing away with labelling of spaces- is therefore crucial to minimize victimisation of women in different spheres. Increasing visibility of the women in spaces can go a long to sensitize people by reducing the association of the private sphere with women and thus help in breaking the public/private dichotomy to a great extent. The myth of protective cocoon that domestic sphere is often associated has long been busted and as far as the assault in the public sphere is concerned it can be contained by the process of de-gendering. Violence, like ‘risk’ has the capability of transcending boundaries, therefore doing away with the concept of strict boundary can be regarded as a probable solution to contain violence in both the spheres. Keywords: Public/private dichotomy, gendering spaces, NCRB reports, patriarchy

Key concepts: Private sphere, Public sphere, Public space, Argument (complex analysis), Invisibility, Sociology, Space (punctuation), Victimisation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Beyond Spaces: Debunking the Public/Private Divide in Understanding Violence Against Women in India — Research Paper | ScholarLens