2019Nephrology Dialysis TransplantationRequires access

SP776IS MORE INTENSIVE INDUCTION IMMUNOSUPPRESSION THERAPY FOR HIGHLY SENSITIZED KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS BETTER ?

Inna Mohamadou, Marie‐Bénédicte Matignon, Stéphanie Malard, Philippe Grimbert, David Buob, Anissa Moktefi, Nacéra Ouali, Éric Rondeau, Yosu Luque

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Induction immunosuppression for highly sensitized kidney recipients varies, in particular the use of plasma exchanges (PE) and rituximab following transplantation to prevent antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and increase graft survival. We compared two induction strategies for patients undergoing kidney transplantation with a high level (MFI>3000) of pre-formed donor-specific antibody (DSA). METHODS: Our retrospective study included 45 kidney transplant recipients in two French centers, transplanted between 2012 and 2017. All patients had at least one pre-formed DSA (MFI > 3000) within 6 months before transplantation. All patients received anti-thymocyte globulin, a calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids on the day of transplantation. 22 of these 45 patients also received 5 PE and one rituximab dose (group A), whereas the remaining 23 patients did not (group B). Patients were followed for 1 to 6 years after transplantation. RESULTS: Comparing group A to group B, recipients’ age (48±14 vs. 47±12 years), donors’ age (54±16 vs. 57±12 years), cold ischemia time (16±6 vs. 19±7 hours) and MFI of the immunodominant DSA (8735±4192 vs. 10106± 6015) were similar (p=ns for all). There was no overall difference in the rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 1 year post-transplantation (n=9, 41% in group A vs. n=7, 30% in group B). ABMR occurred in n=6 vs. n=7 patients, and T-cell mediated rejection was observed in n=3 vs. n=0 patients, respectively in groups A and B. There was no difference in graft survival rate at 1 year post-transplant (91% in group A vs. 83% in group B, p=ns). Finally, the incidence of infectious, anaphylactic, thrombotic or hemorrhagic events was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that an intensive induction immunosuppressive therapy using PE and rituximab during early post-transplantation period does not decrease ABMR incidence or improve 1-year graft survival in highly sensitized recipients. An effect of PE on anti-thymocyte globulin pharmacokinetics could not be excluded.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION: Induction immunosuppression for highly sensitized kidney recipients varies, in particular the use of plasma exchanges (PE) and rituximab following transplantation to prevent antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and increase graft survival. We compared two induction strategies for patients undergoing kidney transplantation with a high level (MFI>3000) of pre-formed donor-specific antibody (DSA). METHODS: Our retrospective study included 45 kidney transplant recipients in two French centers, transplanted between 2012 and 2017. All patients had at least one pre-formed DSA (MFI > 3000) within 6 months before transplantation. All patients received anti-thymocyte globulin, a calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids on the day of transplantation. 22 of these 45 patients also received 5 PE and one rituximab dose (group A), whereas the remaining 23 patients did not (group B). Patients were followed for 1 to 6 years after transplantation. RESULTS: Comparing group A to group B, recipients’ age (48±14 vs. 47±12 years), donors’ age (54±16 vs. 57±12 years), cold ischemia time (16±6 vs. 19±7 hours) and MFI of the immunodominant DSA (8735±4192 vs. 10106± 6015) were similar (p=ns for all). There was no overall difference in the rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 1 year post-transplantation (n=9, 41% in group A vs. n=7, 30% in group B). ABMR occurred in n=6 vs. n=7 patients, and T-cell mediated rejection was observed in n=3 vs. n=0 patients, respectively in groups A and B. There was no difference in graft survival rate at 1 year post-transplant (91% in group A vs. 83% in group B, p=ns). Finally, the incidence of infectious, anaphylactic, thrombotic or hemorrhagic events was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that an intensive induction immunosuppressive therapy using PE and rituximab during early post-transplantation period does not decrease ABMR incidence or improve 1-year graft survival in highly sensitized recipients. An effect of PE on anti-thymocyte globulin pharmacokinetics could not be excluded.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION: Induction immunosuppression for highly sensitized kidney recipients varies, in particular the use of plasma exchanges (PE) and rituximab following transplantation to prevent antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and increase graft survival. We compared two induction strategies for patients undergoing kidney transplantation with a high level (MFI>3000) of pre-formed donor-specific antibody (DSA). METHODS: Our retrospective study included 45 kidney transplant recipients in two French centers, transplanted between 2012 and 2017. All patients had at least one pre-formed DSA (MFI > 3000) within 6 months before transplantation. All patients received anti-thymocyte globulin, a calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids on the day of transplantation. 22 of these 45 patients also received 5 PE and one rituximab dose (group A), whereas the remaining 23 patients did not (group B). Patients were followed for 1 to 6 years after transplantation. RESULTS: Comparing group A to group B, recipients’ age (48±14 vs. 47±12 years), donors’ age (54±16 vs. 57±12 years), cold ischemia time (16±6 vs. 19±7 hours) and MFI of the immunodominant DSA (8735±4192 vs. 10106± 6015) were similar (p=ns for all). There was no overall difference in the rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 1 year post-transplantation (n=9, 41% in group A vs. n=7, 30% in group B). ABMR occurred in n=6 vs. n=7 patients, and T-cell mediated rejection was observed in n=3 vs. n=0 patients, respectively in groups A and B. There was no difference in graft survival rate at 1 year post-transplant (91% in group A vs. 83% in group B, p=ns). Finally, the incidence of infectious, anaphylactic, thrombotic or hemorrhagic events was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that an intensive induction immunosuppressive therapy using PE and rituximab during early post-transplantation period does not decrease ABMR incidence or improve 1-year graft survival in highly sensitized recipients. An effect of PE on anti-thymocyte globulin pharmacokinetics could not be excluded.

Key concepts: Medicine, Immunosuppression, Induction therapy, Kidney transplant, Intensive care medicine, Kidney transplantation, Immunology, Kidney

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
SP776IS MORE INTENSIVE INDUCTION IMMUNOSUPPRESSION THERAPY FOR HIGHLY SENSITIZED KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS BETTER ? — Research Paper | ScholarLens