2019•Unpublished venueRequires access

Rural Institutions and Development

Harry W. Blair, Porus D. Olpadwala

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter briefly examines the kinds of rural institutions (RIs) that are involved in rural development (RD), and then focuses upon one particular form of RI considered especially effective for promoting RD — that of local organization (LO). RIs are perhaps best thought of as channels through which rural people govern local activities, organize themselves both for economic endeavor and to obtain public goods, and articulate their problems and needs to "higher level" political and administrative systems. Milton Esman and Norman Uphoff reason their way through a mass of the essential and practical detail associated with LOs, and then settle upon five features as representing the analytical essence of that form of RI. They are the membership base, the source of authority and of legitimacy, the rationale behind or purpose of the body, the nature and extent of functions performed, and the origin of the resource support.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter briefly examines the kinds of rural institutions (RIs) that are involved in rural development (RD), and then focuses upon one particular form of RI considered especially effective for promoting RD — that of local organization (LO). RIs are perhaps best thought of as channels through which rural people govern local activities, organize themselves both for economic endeavor and to obtain public goods, and articulate their problems and needs to "higher level" political and administrative systems. Milton Esman and Norman Uphoff reason their way through a mass of the essential and practical detail associated with LOs, and then settle upon five features as representing the analytical essence of that form of RI. They are the membership base, the source of authority and of legitimacy, the rationale behind or purpose of the body, the nature and extent of functions performed, and the origin of the resource support.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter briefly examines the kinds of rural institutions (RIs) that are involved in rural development (RD), and then focuses upon one particular form of RI considered especially effective for promoting RD — that of local organization (LO). RIs are perhaps best thought of as channels through which rural people govern local activities, organize themselves both for economic endeavor and to obtain public goods, and articulate their problems and needs to "higher level" political and administrative systems. Milton Esman and Norman Uphoff reason their way through a mass of the essential and practical detail associated with LOs, and then settle upon five features as representing the analytical essence of that form of RI. They are the membership base, the source of authority and of legitimacy, the rationale behind or purpose of the body, the nature and extent of functions performed, and the origin of the resource support.

Key concepts: Geography, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rural Institutions and Development — Research Paper | ScholarLens