An Optimal Affine Invariant Smooth Minimization Algorithm
Alexandre d’Aspremont, Cristóbal Guzmán, Martin Jaggi
Abstract
Open-access reader
Alexandre d’Aspremont, Cristóbal Guzmán, Martin Jaggi
Abstract
Open-access reader
We formulate an affine invariant implementation of the accelerated first-order algorithm in Nesterov (1983). Its complexity bound is proportional to an affine invariant regularity constant defined with respect to the Minkowski gauge of the feasible set. We extend these results to more general problems, optimizing Hölder smooth functions using $p$-uniformly convex prox terms, and derive an algorithm whose complexity better fits the geometry of the feasible set and adapts to both the best Hölder smoothness parameter and the best gradient Lipschitz constant. Finally, we detail matching complexity lower bounds when the feasible set is an $\ell_p$ ball. In this setting, our upper bounds on iteration complexity for the algorithm in Nesterov (1983) are thus optimal in terms of target precision, smoothness and problem dimension.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We formulate an affine invariant implementation of the accelerated first-order algorithm in Nesterov (1983). Its complexity bound is proportional to an affine invariant regularity constant defined with respect to the Minkowski gauge of the feasible set. We extend these results to more general problems, optimizing Hölder smooth functions using $p$-uniformly convex prox terms, and derive an algorithm whose complexity better fits the geometry of the feasible set and adapts to both the best Hölder smoothness parameter and the best gradient Lipschitz constant. Finally, we detail matching complexity lower bounds when the feasible set is an $\ell_p$ ball. In this setting, our upper bounds on iteration complexity for the algorithm in Nesterov (1983) are thus optimal in terms of target precision, smoothness and problem dimension.
Key concepts: Mathematics, Lipschitz continuity, Invariant (physics), Affine transformation, Regular polygon, Smoothness, Minkowski addition, Algorithm