Linearizable Implementations Do Not Suffice for Randomized Distributed Computation
Wojciech Golab, Lisa Highám, Philipp Woelfel
Abstract
Open-access reader
Wojciech Golab, Lisa Highám, Philipp Woelfel
Abstract
Open-access reader
Linearizability is the gold standard among algorithm designers for deducing the correctness of a distributed algorithm using implemented shared objects from the correctness of the corresponding algorithm using atomic versions of the same objects. We show that linearizability does not suffice for this purpose when processes can exploit randomization, and we discuss the existence of alternative correctness conditions.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Linearizability is the gold standard among algorithm designers for deducing the correctness of a distributed algorithm using implemented shared objects from the correctness of the corresponding algorithm using atomic versions of the same objects. We show that linearizability does not suffice for this purpose when processes can exploit randomization, and we discuss the existence of alternative correctness conditions.
Key concepts: Correctness, Linearizability, Computer science, Implementation, Computation, Exploit, Theoretical computer science, Distributed computing