2019Unpublished venueRequires access

Regional Trade Liberalization: The North American Free Trade Agreement

Stephen D. Cohen, Joel R. Paul, Robert A. Blecker

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In the broadest sense, the creation of a free trade area in North America can be viewed as the logical culmination of a pattern of increasing commercial integration among the private sectors of the several countries constituting the region. The specific and immediate catalyst was the emergence in the early 1980s of economic problems in Canada and Mexico. Negotiating North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was the easy part of the US decisionmaking process. Assuring congressional passage of the necessary implementing legislation under the fast-track statute was a far more difficult endeavor. Symptomatic of the argument-counterargument-counter counterargument pirouette into intellectual gridlock was the issue of how to properly calculate Mexican wages. After NAFTA was signed by the three heads of state in December 1992, the ensuing preparations for congressional ratification triggered the most dramatic, emotional, expensive, and mass-marketed public debate in US trade policy history.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the broadest sense, the creation of a free trade area in North America can be viewed as the logical culmination of a pattern of increasing commercial integration among the private sectors of the several countries constituting the region. The specific and immediate catalyst was the emergence in the early 1980s of economic problems in Canada and Mexico. Negotiating North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was the easy part of the US decisionmaking process. Assuring congressional passage of the necessary implementing legislation under the fast-track statute was a far more difficult endeavor. Symptomatic of the argument-counterargument-counter counterargument pirouette into intellectual gridlock was the issue of how to properly calculate Mexican wages. After NAFTA was signed by the three heads of state in December 1992, the ensuing preparations for congressional ratification triggered the most dramatic, emotional, expensive, and mass-marketed public debate in US trade policy history.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the broadest sense, the creation of a free trade area in North America can be viewed as the logical culmination of a pattern of increasing commercial integration among the private sectors of the several countries constituting the region. The specific and immediate catalyst was the emergence in the early 1980s of economic problems in Canada and Mexico. Negotiating North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was the easy part of the US decisionmaking process. Assuring congressional passage of the necessary implementing legislation under the fast-track statute was a far more difficult endeavor. Symptomatic of the argument-counterargument-counter counterargument pirouette into intellectual gridlock was the issue of how to properly calculate Mexican wages. After NAFTA was signed by the three heads of state in December 1992, the ensuing preparations for congressional ratification triggered the most dramatic, emotional, expensive, and mass-marketed public debate in US trade policy history.

Key concepts: Free trade agreement, Free trade, International trade, International economics, Economics, Liberalization, Market economy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Regional Trade Liberalization: The North American Free Trade Agreement — Research Paper | ScholarLens