2019Unpublished venueOpen access

Erosion in living soil and life in eroded soil

Panos Panagos, Alberto Orgiazzi

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The relationship between erosion and biodiversity is reciprocal. Soil organisms can both reduce soil loss, by improving porosity, and increase it, by diminishing soil stability as a result of their mixing activities. Simultaneously, soil runoff has ecological impacts on belowground communities. Despite these obvious interactions, soil erosion models do not consider biodiversity in their estimates and soil ecology has poorly investigated the effects of erosion. In order to start filling in these knowledge gaps, a novel biological factor was developed and introduced, for the first time, into a well-known soil erosion model (the revised universal soil loss equation, RUSLE). Furthermore, insights to advance soil erosion ecology were proposed. Thanks to available data on both soil erosion (Panagos et al., 2015) and earthworm diversity (Rutgers et al., 2016), an “earthworm factor” was generated and applied to produce the first maps of a modified soil erodibility. The incorporation of “earthworm factor” reduces soil erodibility and as a consequence soil erosion. On the other hand, also the erosive events affect the soil-living communities. Potential consequences of soil erosion on soil life were also identified: migration, invasion, violence, defence, rebuilding and functional effects were described. The results showed how new estimates of soil loss can be produced by adding biological factors to soil erosion models. The earthworm factor represents the first step towards the inclusion of a wider biological factor, which takes into account the whole soil-living community, into erosion modelling. Fostering the development of soil erosion ecology for better understanding the reciprocal effects of erosion on soil life, will contribute towards this achievement. The increasing availability of large-scale data on soil biodiversity distribution opens up the possibility of incorporating a biological component into bio-physical models such as the soil erosion one. The model integration between the soil ecologists and soil erosion modellers is key point for identifying the interactions between soil organisms and soil loss

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The relationship between erosion and biodiversity is reciprocal. Soil organisms can both reduce soil loss, by improving porosity, and increase it, by diminishing soil stability as a result of their mixing activities. Simultaneously, soil runoff has ecological impacts on belowground communities. Despite these obvious interactions, soil erosion models do not consider biodiversity in their estimates and soil ecology has poorly investigated the effects of erosion. In order to start filling in these knowledge gaps, a novel biological factor was developed and introduced, for the first time, into a well-known soil erosion model (the revised universal soil loss equation, RUSLE). Furthermore, insights to advance soil erosion ecology were proposed. Thanks to available data on both soil erosion (Panagos et al., 2015) and earthworm diversity (Rutgers et al., 2016), an “earthworm factor” was generated and applied to produce the first maps of a modified soil erodibility. The incorporation of “earthworm factor” reduces soil erodibility and as a consequence soil erosion. On the other hand, also the erosive events affect the soil-living communities. Potential consequences of soil erosion on soil life were also identified: migration, invasion, violence, defence, rebuilding and functional effects were described. The results showed how new estimates of soil loss can be produced by adding biological factors to soil erosion models. The earthworm factor represents the first step towards the inclusion of a wider biological factor, which takes into account the whole soil-living community, into erosion modelling. Fostering the development of soil erosion ecology for better understanding the reciprocal effects of erosion on soil life, will contribute towards this achievement. The increasing availability of large-scale data on soil biodiversity distribution opens up the possibility of incorporating a biological component into bio-physical models such as the soil erosion one. The model integration between the soil ecologists and soil erosion modellers is key point for identifying the interactions between soil organisms and soil loss

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The relationship between erosion and biodiversity is reciprocal. Soil organisms can both reduce soil loss, by improving porosity, and increase it, by diminishing soil stability as a result of their mixing activities. Simultaneously, soil runoff has ecological impacts on belowground communities. Despite these obvious interactions, soil erosion models do not consider biodiversity in their estimates and soil ecology has poorly investigated the effects of erosion. In order to start filling in these knowledge gaps, a novel biological factor was developed and introduced, for the first time, into a well-known soil erosion model (the revised universal soil loss equation, RUSLE). Furthermore, insights to advance soil erosion ecology were proposed. Thanks to available data on both soil erosion (Panagos et al., 2015) and earthworm diversity (Rutgers et al., 2016), an “earthworm factor” was generated and applied to produce the first maps of a modified soil erodibility. The incorporation of “earthworm factor” reduces soil erodibility and as a consequence soil erosion. On the other hand, also the erosive events affect the soil-living communities. Potential consequences of soil erosion on soil life were also identified: migration, invasion, violence, defence, rebuilding and functional effects were described. The results showed how new estimates of soil loss can be produced by adding biological factors to soil erosion models. The earthworm factor represents the first step towards the inclusion of a wider biological factor, which takes into account the whole soil-living community, into erosion modelling. Fostering the development of soil erosion ecology for better understanding the reciprocal effects of erosion on soil life, will contribute towards this achievement. The increasing availability of large-scale data on soil biodiversity distribution opens up the possibility of incorporating a biological component into bio-physical models such as the soil erosion one. The model integration between the soil ecologists and soil erosion modellers is key point for identifying the interactions between soil organisms and soil loss

Key concepts: Erosion, Environmental science, Surface runoff, Earthworm, Soil biodiversity, WEPP, Soil science, Dryland salinity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Erosion in living soil and life in eroded soil — Research Paper | ScholarLens