2017•Scholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University)Requires access

Comparison of Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability in the Two- and Three-Dimensional Configurations

Xuanye Ma, K. Nykyri, Rachel C. Rice, P. A. Delamere

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The Kelvin–Helmholtz (KH) instability is often regarded as one of the most important mechanisms for viscous interaction between the shocked solar wind and the Earth's magnetosphere. It has been observed that KH instability can operate under varies interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) orientations (i.e., north-/southward, dawn-/duskward, Parker spiral and ortho-Parker spiral orientations). Nonlinear KH waves can form thin current layers by dramatically twisting the magnetic field, and consequently triggers magnetic reconnection, which was first illustrated by local two-dimensional (2-D) MHD simulations and was later confirmed by several in-situ observational events. Recently, local three-dimensional (3-D) simulations showed that nonlinear KH instability in the 3-D geometry is fundamentally different from 2-D geometry. Note that most of the KH in-situ observational events are localized at low latitudes and are compared with 2-D scenarios. It is of interest to ask the question what can be misinterpreted if the third dimension is ignored for the nonlinear KH mode. This presentation will provide a systematic comparison between 2-D and 3-D nonlinear KH mode under different IMF orientations, and discuss the potential influence of the interpretation of observational signatures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Kelvin–Helmholtz (KH) instability is often regarded as one of the most important mechanisms for viscous interaction between the shocked solar wind and the Earth's magnetosphere. It has been observed that KH instability can operate under varies interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) orientations (i.e., north-/southward, dawn-/duskward, Parker spiral and ortho-Parker spiral orientations). Nonlinear KH waves can form thin current layers by dramatically twisting the magnetic field, and consequently triggers magnetic reconnection, which was first illustrated by local two-dimensional (2-D) MHD simulations and was later confirmed by several in-situ observational events. Recently, local three-dimensional (3-D) simulations showed that nonlinear KH instability in the 3-D geometry is fundamentally different from 2-D geometry. Note that most of the KH in-situ observational events are localized at low latitudes and are compared with 2-D scenarios. It is of interest to ask the question what can be misinterpreted if the third dimension is ignored for the nonlinear KH mode. This presentation will provide a systematic comparison between 2-D and 3-D nonlinear KH mode under different IMF orientations, and discuss the potential influence of the interpretation of observational signatures.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Kelvin–Helmholtz (KH) instability is often regarded as one of the most important mechanisms for viscous interaction between the shocked solar wind and the Earth's magnetosphere. It has been observed that KH instability can operate under varies interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) orientations (i.e., north-/southward, dawn-/duskward, Parker spiral and ortho-Parker spiral orientations). Nonlinear KH waves can form thin current layers by dramatically twisting the magnetic field, and consequently triggers magnetic reconnection, which was first illustrated by local two-dimensional (2-D) MHD simulations and was later confirmed by several in-situ observational events. Recently, local three-dimensional (3-D) simulations showed that nonlinear KH instability in the 3-D geometry is fundamentally different from 2-D geometry. Note that most of the KH in-situ observational events are localized at low latitudes and are compared with 2-D scenarios. It is of interest to ask the question what can be misinterpreted if the third dimension is ignored for the nonlinear KH mode. This presentation will provide a systematic comparison between 2-D and 3-D nonlinear KH mode under different IMF orientations, and discuss the potential influence of the interpretation of observational signatures.

Key concepts: Instability, Physics, Geology, Mechanics, Classical mechanics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability in the Two- and Three-Dimensional Configurations — Research Paper | ScholarLens