2009Unpublished venueRequires access

Threshold Decryption and Zero-Knowledge Proofs for Lattice-Based Cryptosystems.

Rikke Bendlin, Ivan Damgård

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract. We present a variant of Regev’s cryptosystem first presented in [Reg05], but with a new choice of parameters. By a recent classical re-duction by Peikert we prove the scheme semantically secure based on the worst-case lattice problem GapSVP. From this we construct a threshold cryptosystem which has a very efficient and non-interactive decryption protocol. We prove the threshold cryptosystem secure against passive adversaries corrupting all but one of the players, and againts active ad-versaries corrupting less than one third of the players. We also describe how one can build a distributed key generation protocol. In the final part of the paper we show how one can, in zero-knowledge- prove knowledge of the plaintext contained in a given ciphertext from Regev’s original cryptosystem or our variant. The proof is of size only a constant times the size of the public key. 1

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract. We present a variant of Regev’s cryptosystem first presented in [Reg05], but with a new choice of parameters. By a recent classical re-duction by Peikert we prove the scheme semantically secure based on the worst-case lattice problem GapSVP. From this we construct a threshold cryptosystem which has a very efficient and non-interactive decryption protocol. We prove the threshold cryptosystem secure against passive adversaries corrupting all but one of the players, and againts active ad-versaries corrupting less than one third of the players. We also describe how one can build a distributed key generation protocol. In the final part of the paper we show how one can, in zero-knowledge- prove knowledge of the plaintext contained in a given ciphertext from Regev’s original cryptosystem or our variant. The proof is of size only a constant times the size of the public key. 1

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract. We present a variant of Regev’s cryptosystem first presented in [Reg05], but with a new choice of parameters. By a recent classical re-duction by Peikert we prove the scheme semantically secure based on the worst-case lattice problem GapSVP. From this we construct a threshold cryptosystem which has a very efficient and non-interactive decryption protocol. We prove the threshold cryptosystem secure against passive adversaries corrupting all but one of the players, and againts active ad-versaries corrupting less than one third of the players. We also describe how one can build a distributed key generation protocol. In the final part of the paper we show how one can, in zero-knowledge- prove knowledge of the plaintext contained in a given ciphertext from Regev’s original cryptosystem or our variant. The proof is of size only a constant times the size of the public key. 1

Key concepts: Cryptosystem, Ciphertext, Plaintext, Semantic security, Zero-knowledge proof, Threshold cryptosystem, Hybrid cryptosystem, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Threshold Decryption and Zero-Knowledge Proofs for Lattice-Based Cryptosystems. — Research Paper | ScholarLens