2019•Clinical Spine Surgery A Spine PublicationOpen access

Factors Influencing Interbody Cage Subsidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Hidetoshi Igarashi, Masahiro Hoshino, Keita Omori, Hiromi Matsuzaki, Yasuhiro Nemoto, Takashi Tsuruta, Koji Yamasaki

Open full text 89 citations

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the factors influencing subsidence following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a stand-alone cage. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The relationship between cage subsidence and cage height and material has been reported in previous studies. METHODS: Clinical and radiologic data from 78 patients, 105 levels, undergoing single-level and 2-level ACDF without plates from 2007 to 2015 were collected prospectively. Patients were followed for at least 12 months after surgery. Radiographs were obtained preoperatively, at 1 week, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively to determine the presence of fusion and cage subsidence. RESULTS: There was a correlation in cage height and subsidence (Spearman P<0.05). Cage subsidence was significantly shorter in the polyetheretherketone cages than in titanium cages (P<0.05). However, when cage height was <5 mm, the difference between the 2 groups was not significant. Large subsidence (>3 mm) was observed in 17 patients, 20 levels, many of whom exhibited sinking in the first month after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The greater the cage height, the greater the risk of cage subsidence in ACDF. Polyetheretherketone cages are superior to titanium cages for the maintenance of intervertebral height in cases where cage height is >5.5 mm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the factors influencing subsidence following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a stand-alone cage. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The relationship between cage subsidence and cage height and material has been reported in previous studies. METHODS: Clinical and radiologic data from 78 patients, 105 levels, undergoing single-level and 2-level ACDF without plates from 2007 to 2015 were collected prospectively. Patients were followed for at least 12 months after surgery. Radiographs were obtained preoperatively, at 1 week, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively to determine the presence of fusion and cage subsidence. RESULTS: There was a correlation in cage height and subsidence (Spearman P<0.05). Cage subsidence was significantly shorter in the polyetheretherketone cages than in titanium cages (P<0.05). However, when cage height was <5 mm, the difference between the 2 groups was not significant. Large subsidence (>3 mm) was observed in 17 patients, 20 levels, many of whom exhibited sinking in the first month after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The greater the cage height, the greater the risk of cage subsidence in ACDF. Polyetheretherketone cages are superior to titanium cages for the maintenance of intervertebral height in cases where cage height is >5.5 mm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 89 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the factors influencing subsidence following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a stand-alone cage. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The relationship between cage subsidence and cage height and material has been reported in previous studies. METHODS: Clinical and radiologic data from 78 patients, 105 levels, undergoing single-level and 2-level ACDF without plates from 2007 to 2015 were collected prospectively. Patients were followed for at least 12 months after surgery. Radiographs were obtained preoperatively, at 1 week, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively to determine the presence of fusion and cage subsidence. RESULTS: There was a correlation in cage height and subsidence (Spearman P<0.05). Cage subsidence was significantly shorter in the polyetheretherketone cages than in titanium cages (P<0.05). However, when cage height was <5 mm, the difference between the 2 groups was not significant. Large subsidence (>3 mm) was observed in 17 patients, 20 levels, many of whom exhibited sinking in the first month after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The greater the cage height, the greater the risk of cage subsidence in ACDF. Polyetheretherketone cages are superior to titanium cages for the maintenance of intervertebral height in cases where cage height is >5.5 mm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Key concepts: Cage, Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, Medicine, Subsidence, Radiography, Surgery, Significant difference, Discectomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Factors Influencing Interbody Cage Subsidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion — Research Paper | ScholarLens