2002Acta Phytophylacica SinicaRequires access

Behavioral responses of brown planthopper and white-backed planthopper to BPH-resistant rice varieties

Lin Zhu, Gu Dexiang, Guren Zhang, Jinping You

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Comparison among the behavioral reactions of brown planthopper (BPH) Nilaparvata lugens Stal and white-backed planthopper (WBPH) Sogatella furcifera (Horvath) fed on four BPH-resistant (ASD7, IR36, JX89 and Mudgo) and one BPH-susceptible (TN1) rice varieties were conducted. BPH showed evident non-preference reaction to these resistant varieties, and there were significant differences between BPH (4th after inoculation)/WBPH (8th after inoculation) densities on resistant and susceptible varieties, while the planthopper densities on BPH-resistant varieties, except Mudgo, were similar. On the same BPH-resistant variety, the perference rate on WBPH were significantly higher than that of BPH. There was no time regularity of planthopper density on any rice variety. Both the feeding amounts of BPH and WBPH on resistant varieties were markedly lower than those on TN1, while in comparison with the feeding amounts of BPH on IR36/JX89, those of WBPH were obviously higher. Contrarily, the probing wound number of the two planthopper species on resistant rice varieties were much more than that on TN1, but those of WBPH on ASD7/JX89 were much less than those of BPH. Consequently, there is a negative correlation between the probing wound number and feeding amount of planthopper on any rice variety.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Comparison among the behavioral reactions of brown planthopper (BPH) Nilaparvata lugens Stal and white-backed planthopper (WBPH) Sogatella furcifera (Horvath) fed on four BPH-resistant (ASD7, IR36, JX89 and Mudgo) and one BPH-susceptible (TN1) rice varieties were conducted. BPH showed evident non-preference reaction to these resistant varieties, and there were significant differences between BPH (4th after inoculation)/WBPH (8th after inoculation) densities on resistant and susceptible varieties, while the planthopper densities on BPH-resistant varieties, except Mudgo, were similar. On the same BPH-resistant variety, the perference rate on WBPH were significantly higher than that of BPH. There was no time regularity of planthopper density on any rice variety. Both the feeding amounts of BPH and WBPH on resistant varieties were markedly lower than those on TN1, while in comparison with the feeding amounts of BPH on IR36/JX89, those of WBPH were obviously higher. Contrarily, the probing wound number of the two planthopper species on resistant rice varieties were much more than that on TN1, but those of WBPH on ASD7/JX89 were much less than those of BPH. Consequently, there is a negative correlation between the probing wound number and feeding amount of planthopper on any rice variety.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Comparison among the behavioral reactions of brown planthopper (BPH) Nilaparvata lugens Stal and white-backed planthopper (WBPH) Sogatella furcifera (Horvath) fed on four BPH-resistant (ASD7, IR36, JX89 and Mudgo) and one BPH-susceptible (TN1) rice varieties were conducted. BPH showed evident non-preference reaction to these resistant varieties, and there were significant differences between BPH (4th after inoculation)/WBPH (8th after inoculation) densities on resistant and susceptible varieties, while the planthopper densities on BPH-resistant varieties, except Mudgo, were similar. On the same BPH-resistant variety, the perference rate on WBPH were significantly higher than that of BPH. There was no time regularity of planthopper density on any rice variety. Both the feeding amounts of BPH and WBPH on resistant varieties were markedly lower than those on TN1, while in comparison with the feeding amounts of BPH on IR36/JX89, those of WBPH were obviously higher. Contrarily, the probing wound number of the two planthopper species on resistant rice varieties were much more than that on TN1, but those of WBPH on ASD7/JX89 were much less than those of BPH. Consequently, there is a negative correlation between the probing wound number and feeding amount of planthopper on any rice variety.

Key concepts: Planthopper, Brown planthopper, Delphacidae, White (mutation), Biology, Rice plant, Agronomy, Horticulture

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Behavioral responses of brown planthopper and white-backed planthopper to BPH-resistant rice varieties — Research Paper | ScholarLens