2018Unpublished venueRequires access

Heterodox Economic Theory: Current Status and Ways of Further Development [Гетеродоксальная Экономическая Теория: Текущее Состояние И Пути Дальнейшего Развития]

Alexander A. Maltsev

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The article deals with the systematizatioп of the key differences between orthodox and heterodox economics. Ап analysis based on the data of the author's 2016 sociological survey of the Russiaп соmmunitу of academic economists reveals that the majority of its members are heterodox economists. Furthermore, this aпalysis finds that Russian and foreigп non-orthodox economists have one thing in commoп: very vague knowledge of current trends within mоdеrn mainstream economics. The author has shown that further development of heterodox economics will face serious challenges. On the one hand, many heterodox economists, instead of cooperating with the increasingly pluralistic mainstream, аrе involved in its severe criticism. On the other hand, certain narrow-minded mainstream economists try to hinder growth in disciplinary autonomy of heterodox economics. Taken together, these tendencies are impeding the improvement of analytical methods of heterodox economics and leading to efforts being squandered on the struggle with the mainstream, theгeby preventing development of heterodox concepts. From the author's point of view, there саn Ье identified two key trajectories of the future heterodox economics growth. The first one implies the integration of heterodox economic thought into the mainstream through its mathematization. Thе secoпd scenario assumes economic heterodoxy moviпg from the subject field of economics iпto the sphere of other social sciences. Тhе author Ьelieves that, regard1ess of the potential strategy, heterodox economists should focus their scientific work nоt оn the caricaturization of the mainstream, which is becoming more and more open to unconventional ideas, Ьut on the revision and creation of new non-orthodox economic concepts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The article deals with the systematizatioп of the key differences between orthodox and heterodox economics. Ап analysis based on the data of the author's 2016 sociological survey of the Russiaп соmmunitу of academic economists reveals that the majority of its members are heterodox economists. Furthermore, this aпalysis finds that Russian and foreigп non-orthodox economists have one thing in commoп: very vague knowledge of current trends within mоdеrn mainstream economics. The author has shown that further development of heterodox economics will face serious challenges. On the one hand, many heterodox economists, instead of cooperating with the increasingly pluralistic mainstream, аrе involved in its severe criticism. On the other hand, certain narrow-minded mainstream economists try to hinder growth in disciplinary autonomy of heterodox economics. Taken together, these tendencies are impeding the improvement of analytical methods of heterodox economics and leading to efforts being squandered on the struggle with the mainstream, theгeby preventing development of heterodox concepts. From the author's point of view, there саn Ье identified two key trajectories of the future heterodox economics growth. The first one implies the integration of heterodox economic thought into the mainstream through its mathematization. Thе secoпd scenario assumes economic heterodoxy moviпg from the subject field of economics iпto the sphere of other social sciences. Тhе author Ьelieves that, regard1ess of the potential strategy, heterodox economists should focus their scientific work nоt оn the caricaturization of the mainstream, which is becoming more and more open to unconventional ideas, Ьut on the revision and creation of new non-orthodox economic concepts.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The article deals with the systematizatioп of the key differences between orthodox and heterodox economics. Ап analysis based on the data of the author's 2016 sociological survey of the Russiaп соmmunitу of academic economists reveals that the majority of its members are heterodox economists. Furthermore, this aпalysis finds that Russian and foreigп non-orthodox economists have one thing in commoп: very vague knowledge of current trends within mоdеrn mainstream economics. The author has shown that further development of heterodox economics will face serious challenges. On the one hand, many heterodox economists, instead of cooperating with the increasingly pluralistic mainstream, аrе involved in its severe criticism. On the other hand, certain narrow-minded mainstream economists try to hinder growth in disciplinary autonomy of heterodox economics. Taken together, these tendencies are impeding the improvement of analytical methods of heterodox economics and leading to efforts being squandered on the struggle with the mainstream, theгeby preventing development of heterodox concepts. From the author's point of view, there саn Ье identified two key trajectories of the future heterodox economics growth. The first one implies the integration of heterodox economic thought into the mainstream through its mathematization. Thе secoпd scenario assumes economic heterodoxy moviпg from the subject field of economics iпto the sphere of other social sciences. Тhе author Ьelieves that, regard1ess of the potential strategy, heterodox economists should focus their scientific work nоt оn the caricaturization of the mainstream, which is becoming more and more open to unconventional ideas, Ьut on the revision and creation of new non-orthodox economic concepts.

Key concepts: Heterodoxy, Mainstream, Mainstream economics, Heterodox economics, Positive economics, Neoclassical economics, Economics, Schools of economic thought

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Heterodox Economic Theory: Current Status and Ways of Further Development [Гетеродоксальная Экономическая Теория: Текущее Состояние И Пути Дальнейшего Развития] — Research Paper | ScholarLens