Heterodox Economic Theory: Current Status and Ways of Further Development [Гетеродоксальная Экономическая Теория: Текущее Состояние И Пути Дальнейшего Развития]
Alexander A. Maltsev
Abstract
Alexander A. Maltsev
Abstract
The article deals with the systematizatioп of the key differences between orthodox and heterodox economics. Ап analysis based on the data of the author's 2016 sociological survey of the Russiaп соmmunitу of academic economists reveals that the majority of its members are heterodox economists. Furthermore, this aпalysis finds that Russian and foreigп non-orthodox economists have one thing in commoп: very vague knowledge of current trends within mоdеrn mainstream economics. The author has shown that further development of heterodox economics will face serious challenges. On the one hand, many heterodox economists, instead of cooperating with the increasingly pluralistic mainstream, аrе involved in its severe criticism. On the other hand, certain narrow-minded mainstream economists try to hinder growth in disciplinary autonomy of heterodox economics. Taken together, these tendencies are impeding the improvement of analytical methods of heterodox economics and leading to efforts being squandered on the struggle with the mainstream, theгeby preventing development of heterodox concepts. From the author's point of view, there саn Ье identified two key trajectories of the future heterodox economics growth. The first one implies the integration of heterodox economic thought into the mainstream through its mathematization. Thе secoпd scenario assumes economic heterodoxy moviпg from the subject field of economics iпto the sphere of other social sciences. Тhе author Ьelieves that, regard1ess of the potential strategy, heterodox economists should focus their scientific work nоt оn the caricaturization of the mainstream, which is becoming more and more open to unconventional ideas, Ьut on the revision and creation of new non-orthodox economic concepts.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The article deals with the systematizatioп of the key differences between orthodox and heterodox economics. Ап analysis based on the data of the author's 2016 sociological survey of the Russiaп соmmunitу of academic economists reveals that the majority of its members are heterodox economists. Furthermore, this aпalysis finds that Russian and foreigп non-orthodox economists have one thing in commoп: very vague knowledge of current trends within mоdеrn mainstream economics. The author has shown that further development of heterodox economics will face serious challenges. On the one hand, many heterodox economists, instead of cooperating with the increasingly pluralistic mainstream, аrе involved in its severe criticism. On the other hand, certain narrow-minded mainstream economists try to hinder growth in disciplinary autonomy of heterodox economics. Taken together, these tendencies are impeding the improvement of analytical methods of heterodox economics and leading to efforts being squandered on the struggle with the mainstream, theгeby preventing development of heterodox concepts. From the author's point of view, there саn Ье identified two key trajectories of the future heterodox economics growth. The first one implies the integration of heterodox economic thought into the mainstream through its mathematization. Thе secoпd scenario assumes economic heterodoxy moviпg from the subject field of economics iпto the sphere of other social sciences. Тhе author Ьelieves that, regard1ess of the potential strategy, heterodox economists should focus their scientific work nоt оn the caricaturization of the mainstream, which is becoming more and more open to unconventional ideas, Ьut on the revision and creation of new non-orthodox economic concepts.
Key concepts: Heterodoxy, Mainstream, Mainstream economics, Heterodox economics, Positive economics, Neoclassical economics, Economics, Schools of economic thought