2018White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)Requires access

Do Institutional Investors Rely on Sell-Side Analysts? Evidence from Cash Flow Forecasts and Target Prices

Hala Zaidan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Existing studies show contradicting results regarding the usefulness of sell-side analysts’ forecasts to institutional investors. While institutional investors are the key customers of analysts’ outputs (Ljungqvist et al., 2007) and they respond to it in a sophisticated manner (Malmendier and Shanthikumar, 2014), institutional investors tend to herd following analysts’ stock recommendations (Brown et al., 2014) and institutional investors’ response to analysts’ target prices does not yield to any excess return in the future (Lin et al., 2016). Therefore, in this thesis, I build on this literature and complement it by examining several aspects of this relationship taking into consideration the heterogeneity in the level of informativeness between different types of institutional investors. More specifically, this thesis provides three pieces of empirical evidence on how institutional investors benefit from forecasts provided by sell-side analysts by answering the following three questions: Do cash flow forecasts contain incremental value to institutional investors? Do foreign institutional investors respond to target price revisions? Lastly, do institutional investors herd when using target prices? \nThe findings of this thesis show that, overall, institutional investors respond to cash flow forecasts and target price revisions. In addition, after splitting institutional investors based on their investment horizon, short-term institutional investors showed a greater response to cash flow forecasts compared with long-term institutional investors. Moreover, the results show that foreign institutional investors do respond to analysts’ target price revisions, a behaviour which contributed positively to their profitability. Finally, the results show that institutional investors do herd following target price revisions. After splitting the institutional investors based on their investment, the herding behaviour of short-term institutional investors positively impacted the future stock prices. Overall, the results of this thesis show that institutional investors benefit from sell-side analysts’ forecasts.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Existing studies show contradicting results regarding the usefulness of sell-side analysts’ forecasts to institutional investors. While institutional investors are the key customers of analysts’ outputs (Ljungqvist et al., 2007) and they respond to it in a sophisticated manner (Malmendier and Shanthikumar, 2014), institutional investors tend to herd following analysts’ stock recommendations (Brown et al., 2014) and institutional investors’ response to analysts’ target prices does not yield to any excess return in the future (Lin et al., 2016). Therefore, in this thesis, I build on this literature and complement it by examining several aspects of this relationship taking into consideration the heterogeneity in the level of informativeness between different types of institutional investors. More specifically, this thesis provides three pieces of empirical evidence on how institutional investors benefit from forecasts provided by sell-side analysts by answering the following three questions: Do cash flow forecasts contain incremental value to institutional investors? Do foreign institutional investors respond to target price revisions? Lastly, do institutional investors herd when using target prices? \nThe findings of this thesis show that, overall, institutional investors respond to cash flow forecasts and target price revisions. In addition, after splitting institutional investors based on their investment horizon, short-term institutional investors showed a greater response to cash flow forecasts compared with long-term institutional investors. Moreover, the results show that foreign institutional investors do respond to analysts’ target price revisions, a behaviour which contributed positively to their profitability. Finally, the results show that institutional investors do herd following target price revisions. After splitting the institutional investors based on their investment, the herding behaviour of short-term institutional investors positively impacted the future stock prices. Overall, the results of this thesis show that institutional investors benefit from sell-side analysts’ forecasts.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Existing studies show contradicting results regarding the usefulness of sell-side analysts’ forecasts to institutional investors. While institutional investors are the key customers of analysts’ outputs (Ljungqvist et al., 2007) and they respond to it in a sophisticated manner (Malmendier and Shanthikumar, 2014), institutional investors tend to herd following analysts’ stock recommendations (Brown et al., 2014) and institutional investors’ response to analysts’ target prices does not yield to any excess return in the future (Lin et al., 2016). Therefore, in this thesis, I build on this literature and complement it by examining several aspects of this relationship taking into consideration the heterogeneity in the level of informativeness between different types of institutional investors. More specifically, this thesis provides three pieces of empirical evidence on how institutional investors benefit from forecasts provided by sell-side analysts by answering the following three questions: Do cash flow forecasts contain incremental value to institutional investors? Do foreign institutional investors respond to target price revisions? Lastly, do institutional investors herd when using target prices? \nThe findings of this thesis show that, overall, institutional investors respond to cash flow forecasts and target price revisions. In addition, after splitting institutional investors based on their investment horizon, short-term institutional investors showed a greater response to cash flow forecasts compared with long-term institutional investors. Moreover, the results show that foreign institutional investors do respond to analysts’ target price revisions, a behaviour which contributed positively to their profitability. Finally, the results show that institutional investors do herd following target price revisions. After splitting the institutional investors based on their investment, the herding behaviour of short-term institutional investors positively impacted the future stock prices. Overall, the results of this thesis show that institutional investors benefit from sell-side analysts’ forecasts.

Key concepts: Institutional investor, Cash flow, Business, Monetary economics, Financial economics, Profitability index, Economics, Finance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Do Institutional Investors Rely on Sell-Side Analysts? Evidence from Cash Flow Forecasts and Target Prices — Research Paper | ScholarLens