IMMUNITY OF HEADS OF STATE: SOME CRITICAL REMARKS ON THE DECISION OF THE SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE IN THE CHARLES TAYLOR CASE
Chiara Ragni
Abstract
Chiara Ragni
Abstract
1. PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL HISTORY OF THE CHARGES TAYGOR CASE On 31 May 2004, the Special Court for Sierra Leone (the "Special Court"), one of the so-called internationalized tribunals,' rendered a decision on the validity of the indictment issued by its Prosecutor against the former Liberian President, Charles Ghankay Taylor,2 accused of having committed crimes against humanity, war crimes and other serious violations of international humanitarian law within the territory of Sierra Leone.3 The legality of the indictment and of the arrest war- rant that followed was contested by Charles Taylor's lawyer on the grounds that the Special
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
1. PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL HISTORY OF THE CHARGES TAYGOR CASE On 31 May 2004, the Special Court for Sierra Leone (the "Special Court"), one of the so-called internationalized tribunals,' rendered a decision on the validity of the indictment issued by its Prosecutor against the former Liberian President, Charles Ghankay Taylor,2 accused of having committed crimes against humanity, war crimes and other serious violations of international humanitarian law within the territory of Sierra Leone.3 The legality of the indictment and of the arrest war- rant that followed was contested by Charles Taylor's lawyer on the grounds that the Special
Key concepts: Indictment, Sierra leone, Special court, Principle of legality, Crimes against humanity, Law, War crime, Political science