2009•The Canadian Bar ReviewOpen access

THE PRINCIPLED USE OF HEARSAY IN CIVIL CASES: A TECHNICAL GUIDE TO AVOIDING TECHNICALITY

David M. Paciocco

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

There is misperception that the contextual evaluation permitted by the principled hearsay exception allows civil courts to freely accept hearsay evidence. In fact, there is no wholesale discount for hearsay in civil cases. The intensity with which the rule applies varies with the seriousness of the litigation, and the role played by the evidence. Indeed, regardless of context, to gain admission hearsay should be the best evidence of the declarant’s observations that can reasonably be offered, and there must be a rational basis for accepting it to be true. This paper offers a technical guide to applying these standards.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There is misperception that the contextual evaluation permitted by the principled hearsay exception allows civil courts to freely accept hearsay evidence. In fact, there is no wholesale discount for hearsay in civil cases. The intensity with which the rule applies varies with the seriousness of the litigation, and the role played by the evidence. Indeed, regardless of context, to gain admission hearsay should be the best evidence of the declarant’s observations that can reasonably be offered, and there must be a rational basis for accepting it to be true. This paper offers a technical guide to applying these standards.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There is misperception that the contextual evaluation permitted by the principled hearsay exception allows civil courts to freely accept hearsay evidence. In fact, there is no wholesale discount for hearsay in civil cases. The intensity with which the rule applies varies with the seriousness of the litigation, and the role played by the evidence. Indeed, regardless of context, to gain admission hearsay should be the best evidence of the declarant’s observations that can reasonably be offered, and there must be a rational basis for accepting it to be true. This paper offers a technical guide to applying these standards.

Key concepts: Hearsay, Seriousness, Context (archaeology), Law, Civil procedure, Admissible evidence, Political science, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE PRINCIPLED USE OF HEARSAY IN CIVIL CASES: A TECHNICAL GUIDE TO AVOIDING TECHNICALITY — Research Paper | ScholarLens