2019Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related SurgeryRequires access

Is Acromioplasty Ever Indicated During Rotator Cuff Repair?

D. Landry Jarvis, Brian R. Waterman, Nikhil N. Verma

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

Based on data from a national healthcare insurance carrier in the United States between 2010 and 2012, orthopedic surgeons performed an acromioplasty procedure on 73 to 76% of their arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs. This has remained a prevalent arthroscopic adjunct despite the controversies disputing the role and etiology of external impingement on symptomatic rotator cuff disease. Within the past decade, several randomized studies have demonstrated negligible benefits with acromioplasty performed alongside rotator cuff repair, with no significant differences in either patient-reported outcome scores or retear rates). Conversely, other authors have suggested higher rates of reoperation with rotator cuff repair alone. Critical shoulder angle, an objective measure of lateral acromion extension and glenoid inclination that is considered a gauge of external impingement, has demonstrated an association with rotator cuff tears; Despite this, patient-reported outcomes do not consistently correlate with critical shoulder angle or other variants in acromial morphology after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair. Evidenced-based data is currently lacking to support routine use of acromioplasty in all cases of rotator cuff repair. However, the current available studies do present design flaws, namely statistical underpowering, particularly in type III acromion morphology; inadequate short-term follow-up; lack of imaging data to assess cuff healing; and insensitive outcome measures to capture the theorized benefits of subacromial decompression. Additionally, several relevant merits of acromioplasty have been reported, including decreased abrasive wear with prominent type III acromial morphology, release of natural growth factors to improve rotator cuff healing, and improved visualization during rotator cuff repair. Further evaluation is needed to determine the correct indications for acromioplasty in the setting of cuff repair. Current data would indicate that acromioplasty can be used safely at the discretion of the operating surgeon based on preoperative and intraoperative findings.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Based on data from a national healthcare insurance carrier in the United States between 2010 and 2012, orthopedic surgeons performed an acromioplasty procedure on 73 to 76% of their arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs. This has remained a prevalent arthroscopic adjunct despite the controversies disputing the role and etiology of external impingement on symptomatic rotator cuff disease. Within the past decade, several randomized studies have demonstrated negligible benefits with acromioplasty performed alongside rotator cuff repair, with no significant differences in either patient-reported outcome scores or retear rates). Conversely, other authors have suggested higher rates of reoperation with rotator cuff repair alone. Critical shoulder angle, an objective measure of lateral acromion extension and glenoid inclination that is considered a gauge of external impingement, has demonstrated an association with rotator cuff tears; Despite this, patient-reported outcomes do not consistently correlate with critical shoulder angle or other variants in acromial morphology after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair. Evidenced-based data is currently lacking to support routine use of acromioplasty in all cases of rotator cuff repair. However, the current available studies do present design flaws, namely statistical underpowering, particularly in type III acromion morphology; inadequate short-term follow-up; lack of imaging data to assess cuff healing; and insensitive outcome measures to capture the theorized benefits of subacromial decompression. Additionally, several relevant merits of acromioplasty have been reported, including decreased abrasive wear with prominent type III acromial morphology, release of natural growth factors to improve rotator cuff healing, and improved visualization during rotator cuff repair. Further evaluation is needed to determine the correct indications for acromioplasty in the setting of cuff repair. Current data would indicate that acromioplasty can be used safely at the discretion of the operating surgeon based on preoperative and intraoperative findings.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Based on data from a national healthcare insurance carrier in the United States between 2010 and 2012, orthopedic surgeons performed an acromioplasty procedure on 73 to 76% of their arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs. This has remained a prevalent arthroscopic adjunct despite the controversies disputing the role and etiology of external impingement on symptomatic rotator cuff disease. Within the past decade, several randomized studies have demonstrated negligible benefits with acromioplasty performed alongside rotator cuff repair, with no significant differences in either patient-reported outcome scores or retear rates). Conversely, other authors have suggested higher rates of reoperation with rotator cuff repair alone. Critical shoulder angle, an objective measure of lateral acromion extension and glenoid inclination that is considered a gauge of external impingement, has demonstrated an association with rotator cuff tears; Despite this, patient-reported outcomes do not consistently correlate with critical shoulder angle or other variants in acromial morphology after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair. Evidenced-based data is currently lacking to support routine use of acromioplasty in all cases of rotator cuff repair. However, the current available studies do present design flaws, namely statistical underpowering, particularly in type III acromion morphology; inadequate short-term follow-up; lack of imaging data to assess cuff healing; and insensitive outcome measures to capture the theorized benefits of subacromial decompression. Additionally, several relevant merits of acromioplasty have been reported, including decreased abrasive wear with prominent type III acromial morphology, release of natural growth factors to improve rotator cuff healing, and improved visualization during rotator cuff repair. Further evaluation is needed to determine the correct indications for acromioplasty in the setting of cuff repair. Current data would indicate that acromioplasty can be used safely at the discretion of the operating surgeon based on preoperative and intraoperative findings.

Key concepts: Rotator cuff, Acromion, Medicine, Acromioplasty, Surgery, Orthopedic surgery, Cuff, Tears

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is Acromioplasty Ever Indicated During Rotator Cuff Repair? — Research Paper | ScholarLens