FES Cycling in Stroke: Novel Closed-Loop Algorithm Accommodates Differences in Functional Impairments
Courtney A. Rouse, Ryan J. Downey, Chris M. Gregory, Christian A. Cousin, Victor H. Duenas, Warren E. Dixon
Abstract
Courtney A. Rouse, Ryan J. Downey, Chris M. Gregory, Christian A. Cousin, Victor H. Duenas, Warren E. Dixon
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper was to develop and test a novel control algorithm that enables stroke survivors to pedal a cycle in a desired cadence range despite varying levels of functional abilities after stroke. METHODS: A novel algorithm was developed which automatically adjusts 1) the intensity of functional electrical stimulation (FES) delivered to the leg muscles, and 2) the current delivered to an electric motor. The algorithm automatically switches between assistive, uncontrolled, and resistive modes to accommodate for differences in functional impairment, based on the mismatch between the desired and actual cadence. Lyapunov-based methods were used to theoretically prove that the rider's cadence converges to the desired cadence range. To demonstrate the controller's real-world performance, nine chronic stroke survivors performed two cycling trials: 1) volitional effort only and 2) volitional effort accompanied by the control algorithm assisting and resisting pedaling as needed. RESULTS: With a desired cadence range of 50-55 r/min, the developed controller resulted in an average rms cadence error of 1.90 r/min, compared to 6.16 r/min during volitional-only trials. CONCLUSION: Using FES and an electric motor with a two-sided cadence control objective to assist and resist volitional efforts enabled stroke patients with varying strength and abilities to pedal within a desired cadence range. SIGNIFICANCE: A protocol design that constrains volitional movements with assistance and resistance from FES and a motor shows potential for FES cycles and other rehabilitation robots during stroke rehabilitation.
OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper was to develop and test a novel control algorithm that enables stroke survivors to pedal a cycle in a desired cadence range despite varying levels of functional abilities after stroke. METHODS: A novel algorithm was developed which automatically adjusts 1) the intensity of functional electrical stimulation (FES) delivered to the leg muscles, and 2) the current delivered to an electric motor. The algorithm automatically switches between assistive, uncontrolled, and resistive modes to accommodate for differences in functional impairment, based on the mismatch between the desired and actual cadence. Lyapunov-based methods were used to theoretically prove that the rider's cadence converges to the desired cadence range. To demonstrate the controller's real-world performance, nine chronic stroke survivors performed two cycling trials: 1) volitional effort only and 2) volitional effort accompanied by the control algorithm assisting and resisting pedaling as needed. RESULTS: With a desired cadence range of 50-55 r/min, the developed controller resulted in an average rms cadence error of 1.90 r/min, compared to 6.16 r/min during volitional-only trials. CONCLUSION: Using FES and an electric motor with a two-sided cadence control objective to assist and resist volitional efforts enabled stroke patients with varying strength and abilities to pedal within a desired cadence range. SIGNIFICANCE: A protocol design that constrains volitional movements with assistance and resistance from FES and a motor shows potential for FES cycles and other rehabilitation robots during stroke rehabilitation.
Key concepts: Cadence, Functional electrical stimulation, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Stroke (engine), Rehabilitation, Cycling, Rehabilitation robotics, Computer science