2011The Blackwell Companion to PhonologyRequires access

Syllable‐Internal Structure

Anna R. K. Bosch

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

There is no simple discovery procedure for determining phonological syllable structure (which, like phonological representations in general, may not be in a one‐to‐one relationship with systematic phonetic syllabification, and which may not necessarily conform to native speaker intuitions about syllable division). The nature of the mechanism which assigns syllabification (defines possible syllables) for a given language is an empirical hypothesis, whose confirmation depends on the extent to which linguistically significant generalizations can be expressed under it (Feinstein 1979: 255).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There is no simple discovery procedure for determining phonological syllable structure (which, like phonological representations in general, may not be in a one‐to‐one relationship with systematic phonetic syllabification, and which may not necessarily conform to native speaker intuitions about syllable division). The nature of the mechanism which assigns syllabification (defines possible syllables) for a given language is an empirical hypothesis, whose confirmation depends on the extent to which linguistically significant generalizations can be expressed under it (Feinstein 1979: 255).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There is no simple discovery procedure for determining phonological syllable structure (which, like phonological representations in general, may not be in a one‐to‐one relationship with systematic phonetic syllabification, and which may not necessarily conform to native speaker intuitions about syllable division). The nature of the mechanism which assigns syllabification (defines possible syllables) for a given language is an empirical hypothesis, whose confirmation depends on the extent to which linguistically significant generalizations can be expressed under it (Feinstein 1979: 255).

Key concepts: Syllabification, Syllable, Linguistics, Simple (philosophy), Phonology, Computer science, Mechanism (biology), Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Syllable‐Internal Structure — Research Paper | ScholarLens