2019Underground SpaceOpen access

Centrifuge modeling of tunneling-induced ground surface settlement in sand

Hu Lü, Jiangwei Shi, Yu Wang, Rong Wang

Open full text 44 citations

Abstract

Stress changes in the soil induced by tunnel excavation may cause excessive ground settlement. However, high-quality experimental data on ground settlement due to tunnel excavation are limited. In this study, centrifuge tests are conducted to investigate the three-dimensional ground surface settlement, considering different intersection angles and cover-to-tunnel diameter ratios. The results indicate that the major influence zone along the longitudinal direction on the ground surface settlement is ±1.25 D , where D is the tunnel diameter. When the monitoring section is perpendicular to the tunneling direction, the transverse ground settlement due to the tunnel excavation is symmetrical with respect to the tunnel centerline. In contrast, an asymmetric ground settlement profile is observed when the monitoring section intersects the tunneling direction at an angle of 60°. Applying a Gaussian curve to fit the ground surface settlement curve, the width parameter, K (i.e., the distance between the tunnel centerline and the inflection point of the settlement trough to the tunnel burial depth), varies from 0.33 to 0.39. The ground surface settlement induced by twin tunnel excavation can be captured reasonably by superimposing two identical Gaussian curves. When the cover to tunnel diameter ratios ( C / D ) are 1.5 and 2.7, the maximum ground surface settlements are 0.67% of D and 0.35% of D , respectively. It is clear that the maximum ground surface settlement decreases with an increase in the C / D ratio.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Stress changes in the soil induced by tunnel excavation may cause excessive ground settlement. However, high-quality experimental data on ground settlement due to tunnel excavation are limited. In this study, centrifuge tests are conducted to investigate the three-dimensional ground surface settlement, considering different intersection angles and cover-to-tunnel diameter ratios. The results indicate that the major influence zone along the longitudinal direction on the ground surface settlement is ±1.25 D , where D is the tunnel diameter. When the monitoring section is perpendicular to the tunneling direction, the transverse ground settlement due to the tunnel excavation is symmetrical with respect to the tunnel centerline. In contrast, an asymmetric ground settlement profile is observed when the monitoring section intersects the tunneling direction at an angle of 60°. Applying a Gaussian curve to fit the ground surface settlement curve, the width parameter, K (i.e., the distance between the tunnel centerline and the inflection point of the settlement trough to the tunnel burial depth), varies from 0.33 to 0.39. The ground surface settlement induced by twin tunnel excavation can be captured reasonably by superimposing two identical Gaussian curves. When the cover to tunnel diameter ratios ( C / D ) are 1.5 and 2.7, the maximum ground surface settlements are 0.67% of D and 0.35% of D , respectively. It is clear that the maximum ground surface settlement decreases with an increase in the C / D ratio.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 44 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Stress changes in the soil induced by tunnel excavation may cause excessive ground settlement. However, high-quality experimental data on ground settlement due to tunnel excavation are limited. In this study, centrifuge tests are conducted to investigate the three-dimensional ground surface settlement, considering different intersection angles and cover-to-tunnel diameter ratios. The results indicate that the major influence zone along the longitudinal direction on the ground surface settlement is ±1.25 D , where D is the tunnel diameter. When the monitoring section is perpendicular to the tunneling direction, the transverse ground settlement due to the tunnel excavation is symmetrical with respect to the tunnel centerline. In contrast, an asymmetric ground settlement profile is observed when the monitoring section intersects the tunneling direction at an angle of 60°. Applying a Gaussian curve to fit the ground surface settlement curve, the width parameter, K (i.e., the distance between the tunnel centerline and the inflection point of the settlement trough to the tunnel burial depth), varies from 0.33 to 0.39. The ground surface settlement induced by twin tunnel excavation can be captured reasonably by superimposing two identical Gaussian curves. When the cover to tunnel diameter ratios ( C / D ) are 1.5 and 2.7, the maximum ground surface settlements are 0.67% of D and 0.35% of D , respectively. It is clear that the maximum ground surface settlement decreases with an increase in the C / D ratio.

Key concepts: Settlement (finance), Geotechnical engineering, Excavation, Geology, Centrifuge, Quantum tunnelling, Geometry, Materials science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Centrifuge modeling of tunneling-induced ground surface settlement in sand — Research Paper | ScholarLens