1993•Index of Texas Archaeology Open Access Grey Literature from the Lone Star StateOpen access

Means of Site Preservation in East Texas

Timothy K. Perttula

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Although thousands of archeological sites are destroyed annually in Texas, there are effective ways to preserve them using existing State and Federal laws and regulations. These are not simply paperwork exercised, since the tangible results help to insure that prehistoric and historic sites are preservedas a special trust for the benefit of Texas' future generations. I encourage all persons interested in protecting and preserving the heritage of Texas to be an advocate to public and private landowners about site preservation. Rather than review in detail applicable State and Federal laws about site preservation, a summary paper has been distributed here at the Conference. I will focus on the key points of site preservation as a means to initiate discussion on these issues. Designating archeological sites as State Archeological Landmarks (SAL) or listing them on the National Register of Historic Places are two of the best known and effective means of preserving archeological sites in Texas.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Although thousands of archeological sites are destroyed annually in Texas, there are effective ways to preserve them using existing State and Federal laws and regulations. These are not simply paperwork exercised, since the tangible results help to insure that prehistoric and historic sites are preservedas a special trust for the benefit of Texas' future generations. I encourage all persons interested in protecting and preserving the heritage of Texas to be an advocate to public and private landowners about site preservation. Rather than review in detail applicable State and Federal laws about site preservation, a summary paper has been distributed here at the Conference. I will focus on the key points of site preservation as a means to initiate discussion on these issues. Designating archeological sites as State Archeological Landmarks (SAL) or listing them on the National Register of Historic Places are two of the best known and effective means of preserving archeological sites in Texas.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Although thousands of archeological sites are destroyed annually in Texas, there are effective ways to preserve them using existing State and Federal laws and regulations. These are not simply paperwork exercised, since the tangible results help to insure that prehistoric and historic sites are preservedas a special trust for the benefit of Texas' future generations. I encourage all persons interested in protecting and preserving the heritage of Texas to be an advocate to public and private landowners about site preservation. Rather than review in detail applicable State and Federal laws about site preservation, a summary paper has been distributed here at the Conference. I will focus on the key points of site preservation as a means to initiate discussion on these issues. Designating archeological sites as State Archeological Landmarks (SAL) or listing them on the National Register of Historic Places are two of the best known and effective means of preserving archeological sites in Texas.

Key concepts: Historic site, Listing (finance), State (computer science), Archaeology, Prehistory, World heritage, History, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Means of Site Preservation in East Texas — Research Paper | ScholarLens