2018•Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering BOpen access

Influence of Intercropping Maize with Cowpea and Fertilization with Clinoptilolite on Forage Yield and Quality

Ivan Horvatić, Zlatko Svečnjak, Dubravko Mačešić, Dario Jareš, Darko Uher

Open full text 7 citations

Abstract

Maize forage is poor in protein content which leads to low quality and nutritive value.Regarding the high feed costs of protein supplementations, legumes can be used in livestock nutrition for their high protein content, and thus, provide cost savings.In this study, maize (Zea mays L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) were intercropped in different sowing densities and fertilization with clinoptilolite and their monocropping equivalents were tested to determine the best intercropping system on forage yield and quality.Maize was cultivated alone (75,000 plants•ha -1 ) and intercropped with cowpea as follows: 75,000 plants•ha -1 of maize and 37,500 plants•ha -1 of cowpea (MC 1 ), 75,000 plants•ha -1 of maize and 50,000 plants•ha -1 of cowpea (MC 2 ) and 75,000 plants•ha -1 of maize and 75,000 plants•ha -1 of cowpea (MC 3 ), in rows alternating with maize.The highest dry matter yield was produced by MC 3 (23.8t•ha -1 ), and the lowest by SM (20.7 t•ha -1 ) in fertilization with clinoptilolite.All intercropped systems had higher crude protein contents, MC 1 (101 g•kg -1 DM), MC 2 (108 g•kg -1 DM) and MC 3 (117 g•kg -1 DM), than the monocrop maize (84 g•kg -1 DM) in fertilization with clinoptilolite.Intercropping of maize with cowpea and fertilization with clinoptilolite reduced neutral detergent fiber, resulting in increased forage digestibility.Therefore, maize intercropping with cowpea and fertilization with clinoptilolite could substantially increase forage quantity and quality, and decrease requirements for protein supplements as compared with maize monocrop.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Maize forage is poor in protein content which leads to low quality and nutritive value.Regarding the high feed costs of protein supplementations, legumes can be used in livestock nutrition for their high protein content, and thus, provide cost savings.In this study, maize (Zea mays L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) were intercropped in different sowing densities and fertilization with clinoptilolite and their monocropping equivalents were tested to determine the best intercropping system on forage yield and quality.Maize was cultivated alone (75,000 plants•ha -1 ) and intercropped with cowpea as follows: 75,000 plants•ha -1 of maize and 37,500 plants•ha -1 of cowpea (MC 1 ), 75,000 plants•ha -1 of maize and 50,000 plants•ha -1 of cowpea (MC 2 ) and 75,000 plants•ha -1 of maize and 75,000 plants•ha -1 of cowpea (MC 3 ), in rows alternating with maize.The highest dry matter yield was produced by MC 3 (23.8t•ha -1 ), and the lowest by SM (20.7 t•ha -1 ) in fertilization with clinoptilolite.All intercropped systems had higher crude protein contents, MC 1 (101 g•kg -1 DM), MC 2 (108 g•kg -1 DM) and MC 3 (117 g•kg -1 DM), than the monocrop maize (84 g•kg -1 DM) in fertilization with clinoptilolite.Intercropping of maize with cowpea and fertilization with clinoptilolite reduced neutral detergent fiber, resulting in increased forage digestibility.Therefore, maize intercropping with cowpea and fertilization with clinoptilolite could substantially increase forage quantity and quality, and decrease requirements for protein supplements as compared with maize monocrop.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Maize forage is poor in protein content which leads to low quality and nutritive value.Regarding the high feed costs of protein supplementations, legumes can be used in livestock nutrition for their high protein content, and thus, provide cost savings.In this study, maize (Zea mays L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) were intercropped in different sowing densities and fertilization with clinoptilolite and their monocropping equivalents were tested to determine the best intercropping system on forage yield and quality.Maize was cultivated alone (75,000 plants•ha -1 ) and intercropped with cowpea as follows: 75,000 plants•ha -1 of maize and 37,500 plants•ha -1 of cowpea (MC 1 ), 75,000 plants•ha -1 of maize and 50,000 plants•ha -1 of cowpea (MC 2 ) and 75,000 plants•ha -1 of maize and 75,000 plants•ha -1 of cowpea (MC 3 ), in rows alternating with maize.The highest dry matter yield was produced by MC 3 (23.8t•ha -1 ), and the lowest by SM (20.7 t•ha -1 ) in fertilization with clinoptilolite.All intercropped systems had higher crude protein contents, MC 1 (101 g•kg -1 DM), MC 2 (108 g•kg -1 DM) and MC 3 (117 g•kg -1 DM), than the monocrop maize (84 g•kg -1 DM) in fertilization with clinoptilolite.Intercropping of maize with cowpea and fertilization with clinoptilolite reduced neutral detergent fiber, resulting in increased forage digestibility.Therefore, maize intercropping with cowpea and fertilization with clinoptilolite could substantially increase forage quantity and quality, and decrease requirements for protein supplements as compared with maize monocrop.

Key concepts: Intercropping, Agronomy, Forage, Human fertilization, Yield (engineering), Clinoptilolite, Biology, Environmental science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Influence of Intercropping Maize with Cowpea and Fertilization with Clinoptilolite on Forage Yield and Quality — Research Paper | ScholarLens