2012•Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparing Policy Impacts of Different Household Demand Systems in a CGE Model

Liangyue Cao, Tony Wiskich, Cedric Hodges, Krispin McAndrew

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In any computable general equilibrium model (CGE), assumption on its household demand system needs to be made for households to determine their demands on consumption goods, along with assumptions on production functions for firms to determine their demands on inputs for production. Different assumptions can lead to different results. The degree of differences depends on particular simulations, which can be big or small. Australian Treasury has recently developed a computable general equilibrium model. The model is global and recursively dynamic. The model allows flexible sectoral and regional disaggregation, depending on policy problems to be modelled. The model assumes AIDADS (an implicitly directly additive demand system) household demand which, according to published literature, better captures the endogenous changes in income elasticity with changes in income over time. The model also assumes sector-specific capital and allows capital to be under-utilised to maintain a required minimum rate of return for each sector. In this paper, the above Treasury CGE model is used to investigate how the assumption on household demand system affects the model results under policy. In doing so, three household demand systems are tested in the Treasury CGE model, namely the linear expenditure system (LES), the constant difference elasticity (CDE) demand system and the AIDADS. Four hypothetic policy cases are simulated, which are higher food price, higher household income tax, higher labour productivity and carbon pricing. The analysis will study the income elasticity path with changing income over time, the impacts on Gross Domestic Product and the international trade effects under the three household demand systems. It is intended that this analysis will provide useful insights for understanding long run properties of the model under each household demand system and whether each demand system reasonably captures the expected long run behaviour of the model. ...

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In any computable general equilibrium model (CGE), assumption on its household demand system needs to be made for households to determine their demands on consumption goods, along with assumptions on production functions for firms to determine their demands on inputs for production. Different assumptions can lead to different results. The degree of differences depends on particular simulations, which can be big or small. Australian Treasury has recently developed a computable general equilibrium model. The model is global and recursively dynamic. The model allows flexible sectoral and regional disaggregation, depending on policy problems to be modelled. The model assumes AIDADS (an implicitly directly additive demand system) household demand which, according to published literature, better captures the endogenous changes in income elasticity with changes in income over time. The model also assumes sector-specific capital and allows capital to be under-utilised to maintain a required minimum rate of return for each sector. In this paper, the above Treasury CGE model is used to investigate how the assumption on household demand system affects the model results under policy. In doing so, three household demand systems are tested in the Treasury CGE model, namely the linear expenditure system (LES), the constant difference elasticity (CDE) demand system and the AIDADS. Four hypothetic policy cases are simulated, which are higher food price, higher household income tax, higher labour productivity and carbon pricing. The analysis will study the income elasticity path with changing income over time, the impacts on Gross Domestic Product and the international trade effects under the three household demand systems. It is intended that this analysis will provide useful insights for understanding long run properties of the model under each household demand system and whether each demand system reasonably captures the expected long run behaviour of the model. ...

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In any computable general equilibrium model (CGE), assumption on its household demand system needs to be made for households to determine their demands on consumption goods, along with assumptions on production functions for firms to determine their demands on inputs for production. Different assumptions can lead to different results. The degree of differences depends on particular simulations, which can be big or small. Australian Treasury has recently developed a computable general equilibrium model. The model is global and recursively dynamic. The model allows flexible sectoral and regional disaggregation, depending on policy problems to be modelled. The model assumes AIDADS (an implicitly directly additive demand system) household demand which, according to published literature, better captures the endogenous changes in income elasticity with changes in income over time. The model also assumes sector-specific capital and allows capital to be under-utilised to maintain a required minimum rate of return for each sector. In this paper, the above Treasury CGE model is used to investigate how the assumption on household demand system affects the model results under policy. In doing so, three household demand systems are tested in the Treasury CGE model, namely the linear expenditure system (LES), the constant difference elasticity (CDE) demand system and the AIDADS. Four hypothetic policy cases are simulated, which are higher food price, higher household income tax, higher labour productivity and carbon pricing. The analysis will study the income elasticity path with changing income over time, the impacts on Gross Domestic Product and the international trade effects under the three household demand systems. It is intended that this analysis will provide useful insights for understanding long run properties of the model under each household demand system and whether each demand system reasonably captures the expected long run behaviour of the model. ...

Key concepts: Computable general equilibrium, Economics, Price elasticity of demand, Econometrics, Income elasticity of demand, Consumption (sociology), Treasury, Productivity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparing Policy Impacts of Different Household Demand Systems in a CGE Model — Research Paper | ScholarLens