2014Jurnal Kesehatan PrimaOpen access

Komparasi Pemberian Fiexadol Dan Chlorhexiddie Sebagai Oral Hygiene Terhadap Pencegahan Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP)

Hadi Kusuma Atmaja

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract : Patients in critical care unit inserted by ventilators could potentially develop complications as known by Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP). The preventions of VAP include non-pharmacological and pharmacological intervention. Pharmacological prevention of  VAP is the use of antiseptic drug in oral hygiene procedure. Kinds of anticeptic drugs are hexadol (hexetidine) and chlorhexidine. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of oral hygiene with hexadol and chlorhexidine in patients with mechanical ventilator in ICU. The study was a quasi-experiemntal two group design. There were 30 subjects recruited by purposive sampling in the ICU at Pantiwilasa hospitals on street Dr. Cipto and Citarum Semarang. The subjects were divided randomly into 2 groups: 15 subjects given by hexadol 0,1% and 15 subjects given by chlorhexidine 0,2% for twice a day. VAP was assessed by Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score(CPIS). The results show that CPIS ≤ 5 was no VAP at 96,67% and ≥ 6 was VAP at 3,33%. There was no significant difference between oral hygiene with hexadol and chlorhexidine (U=78; p<0,14). Oral hygine with hexadol twice a day was as effective as oral hygiene with chlorhexidine to prevent VAP.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : Patients in critical care unit inserted by ventilators could potentially develop complications as known by Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP). The preventions of VAP include non-pharmacological and pharmacological intervention. Pharmacological prevention of  VAP is the use of antiseptic drug in oral hygiene procedure. Kinds of anticeptic drugs are hexadol (hexetidine) and chlorhexidine. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of oral hygiene with hexadol and chlorhexidine in patients with mechanical ventilator in ICU. The study was a quasi-experiemntal two group design. There were 30 subjects recruited by purposive sampling in the ICU at Pantiwilasa hospitals on street Dr. Cipto and Citarum Semarang. The subjects were divided randomly into 2 groups: 15 subjects given by hexadol 0,1% and 15 subjects given by chlorhexidine 0,2% for twice a day. VAP was assessed by Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score(CPIS). The results show that CPIS ≤ 5 was no VAP at 96,67% and ≥ 6 was VAP at 3,33%. There was no significant difference between oral hygiene with hexadol and chlorhexidine (U=78; p<0,14). Oral hygine with hexadol twice a day was as effective as oral hygiene with chlorhexidine to prevent VAP.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : Patients in critical care unit inserted by ventilators could potentially develop complications as known by Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP). The preventions of VAP include non-pharmacological and pharmacological intervention. Pharmacological prevention of  VAP is the use of antiseptic drug in oral hygiene procedure. Kinds of anticeptic drugs are hexadol (hexetidine) and chlorhexidine. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of oral hygiene with hexadol and chlorhexidine in patients with mechanical ventilator in ICU. The study was a quasi-experiemntal two group design. There were 30 subjects recruited by purposive sampling in the ICU at Pantiwilasa hospitals on street Dr. Cipto and Citarum Semarang. The subjects were divided randomly into 2 groups: 15 subjects given by hexadol 0,1% and 15 subjects given by chlorhexidine 0,2% for twice a day. VAP was assessed by Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score(CPIS). The results show that CPIS ≤ 5 was no VAP at 96,67% and ≥ 6 was VAP at 3,33%. There was no significant difference between oral hygiene with hexadol and chlorhexidine (U=78; p<0,14). Oral hygine with hexadol twice a day was as effective as oral hygiene with chlorhexidine to prevent VAP.

Key concepts: Chlorhexidine, Ventilator-associated pneumonia, Medicine, Antiseptic, Oral hygiene, Pneumonia, Intensive care unit, Hygiene

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Komparasi Pemberian Fiexadol Dan Chlorhexiddie Sebagai Oral Hygiene Terhadap Pencegahan Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP) — Research Paper | ScholarLens