2017Griffith Research OnlineOpen access

A Fragile Equilibrium: Undergraduate Art Education and the University

Elisabeth Findlay

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In recent years there has been considerable discussion of practice-led research and how the work of creative practitioners can be reconciled with the metrics of the University system. There has been much less consideration and reflection on the undergraduate degree and the impact of the University framework has had on the formative years of art school students. This paper examines the relationship between undergraduate art education and the institution of the University within an Australian context. It focuses on the realities, tensions and possibilities of art education as embedded within a University. It asks what value is there in art schools being part of an educational institution that was not originally designed for artists? What are the tensions and elisions with other traditional disciplines? The paper argues that we are at a watershed moment in the history of art education and that art education in the 21st century requires new parameters and ways of thinking.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In recent years there has been considerable discussion of practice-led research and how the work of creative practitioners can be reconciled with the metrics of the University system. There has been much less consideration and reflection on the undergraduate degree and the impact of the University framework has had on the formative years of art school students. This paper examines the relationship between undergraduate art education and the institution of the University within an Australian context. It focuses on the realities, tensions and possibilities of art education as embedded within a University. It asks what value is there in art schools being part of an educational institution that was not originally designed for artists? What are the tensions and elisions with other traditional disciplines? The paper argues that we are at a watershed moment in the history of art education and that art education in the 21st century requires new parameters and ways of thinking.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In recent years there has been considerable discussion of practice-led research and how the work of creative practitioners can be reconciled with the metrics of the University system. There has been much less consideration and reflection on the undergraduate degree and the impact of the University framework has had on the formative years of art school students. This paper examines the relationship between undergraduate art education and the institution of the University within an Australian context. It focuses on the realities, tensions and possibilities of art education as embedded within a University. It asks what value is there in art schools being part of an educational institution that was not originally designed for artists? What are the tensions and elisions with other traditional disciplines? The paper argues that we are at a watershed moment in the history of art education and that art education in the 21st century requires new parameters and ways of thinking.

Key concepts: Formative assessment, Institution, Higher education, Context (archaeology), Visual arts education, Sociology, Pedagogy, Work (physics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Fragile Equilibrium: Undergraduate Art Education and the University — Research Paper | ScholarLens