2019•International Journal of Sports Physiology and PerformanceOpen access

Effects of Plyometric Versus Optimum Power Load Training on Components of Physical Fitness in Young Male Soccer Players

João Ribeiro, Luís Augusto Teixeira, Rui Lemos, Anderson Santiago Teixeira, Vítor Moreira, Pedro Silva, Fábio Yuzo Nakamura

Open full text 34 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: The current study aimed to compare the effects of plyometric (PT) versus optimum power load (OPL) training on physical performance of young high-level soccer players. METHODS: Athletes were randomly divided into PT (horizontal and vertical drills) and OPL (squat + hip thrust exercises at the load of maximum power output) interventions, applied over 7 weeks during the in-season period. Squat and countermovement jumps, maximal sprint (10 and 30 m), and change of direction (COD; agility t test) were the pretraining and posttraining measured performance variables. Magnitude-based inference was used for within- and between-group comparisons. RESULTS: OPL training induced moderate improvements in vertical squat jump (effect size [ES]: 0.97; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-1.61) and countermovement jump (ES: 1.02; 90% CI, 0.46-1.57), 30-m sprint speed (ES: 1.02; 90% CI, 0.09-1.95), and COD performance (ES: 0.93; 90% CI, 0.50-1.36). After PT training method, vertical squat jump (ES: 1.08; 90% CI, 0.66-1.51) and countermovement jump (ES: 0.62; 90% CI, 0.18-1.06) were moderately increased, while small enhancements were noticed for 30-m sprint speed (ES: 0.21; 90% CI, -0.02 to 0.45) and COD performance (ES: 0.53; 90% CI, 0.24-0.81). The 10-m sprint speed possibly increased after PT intervention (small ES: 0.25; 90% CI, -0.05 to 0.54), but no substantial change (small ES: 0.36; 90% CI, -0.40 to 1.13) was noticed in OPL. For between-group analyses, the COD ability and 30-m sprint performances were possibly (small ES: 0.30; 90% CI, -0.20 to 0.81; Δ = +1.88%) and likely (moderate ES: 0.81; 90% CI, -0.16 to 1.78; Δ = +2.38%) more improved in the OPL than in the PT intervention, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 2 different training programs improved physical performance outcomes during the in-season period. However, the combination of vertically and horizontally based training exercises (squat + hip thrust) at optimum power zone led to superior gains in COD and 30-m linear sprint performances.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: The current study aimed to compare the effects of plyometric (PT) versus optimum power load (OPL) training on physical performance of young high-level soccer players. METHODS: Athletes were randomly divided into PT (horizontal and vertical drills) and OPL (squat + hip thrust exercises at the load of maximum power output) interventions, applied over 7 weeks during the in-season period. Squat and countermovement jumps, maximal sprint (10 and 30 m), and change of direction (COD; agility t test) were the pretraining and posttraining measured performance variables. Magnitude-based inference was used for within- and between-group comparisons. RESULTS: OPL training induced moderate improvements in vertical squat jump (effect size [ES]: 0.97; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-1.61) and countermovement jump (ES: 1.02; 90% CI, 0.46-1.57), 30-m sprint speed (ES: 1.02; 90% CI, 0.09-1.95), and COD performance (ES: 0.93; 90% CI, 0.50-1.36). After PT training method, vertical squat jump (ES: 1.08; 90% CI, 0.66-1.51) and countermovement jump (ES: 0.62; 90% CI, 0.18-1.06) were moderately increased, while small enhancements were noticed for 30-m sprint speed (ES: 0.21; 90% CI, -0.02 to 0.45) and COD performance (ES: 0.53; 90% CI, 0.24-0.81). The 10-m sprint speed possibly increased after PT intervention (small ES: 0.25; 90% CI, -0.05 to 0.54), but no substantial change (small ES: 0.36; 90% CI, -0.40 to 1.13) was noticed in OPL. For between-group analyses, the COD ability and 30-m sprint performances were possibly (small ES: 0.30; 90% CI, -0.20 to 0.81; Δ = +1.88%) and likely (moderate ES: 0.81; 90% CI, -0.16 to 1.78; Δ = +2.38%) more improved in the OPL than in the PT intervention, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 2 different training programs improved physical performance outcomes during the in-season period. However, the combination of vertically and horizontally based training exercises (squat + hip thrust) at optimum power zone led to superior gains in COD and 30-m linear sprint performances.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 34 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: The current study aimed to compare the effects of plyometric (PT) versus optimum power load (OPL) training on physical performance of young high-level soccer players. METHODS: Athletes were randomly divided into PT (horizontal and vertical drills) and OPL (squat + hip thrust exercises at the load of maximum power output) interventions, applied over 7 weeks during the in-season period. Squat and countermovement jumps, maximal sprint (10 and 30 m), and change of direction (COD; agility t test) were the pretraining and posttraining measured performance variables. Magnitude-based inference was used for within- and between-group comparisons. RESULTS: OPL training induced moderate improvements in vertical squat jump (effect size [ES]: 0.97; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-1.61) and countermovement jump (ES: 1.02; 90% CI, 0.46-1.57), 30-m sprint speed (ES: 1.02; 90% CI, 0.09-1.95), and COD performance (ES: 0.93; 90% CI, 0.50-1.36). After PT training method, vertical squat jump (ES: 1.08; 90% CI, 0.66-1.51) and countermovement jump (ES: 0.62; 90% CI, 0.18-1.06) were moderately increased, while small enhancements were noticed for 30-m sprint speed (ES: 0.21; 90% CI, -0.02 to 0.45) and COD performance (ES: 0.53; 90% CI, 0.24-0.81). The 10-m sprint speed possibly increased after PT intervention (small ES: 0.25; 90% CI, -0.05 to 0.54), but no substantial change (small ES: 0.36; 90% CI, -0.40 to 1.13) was noticed in OPL. For between-group analyses, the COD ability and 30-m sprint performances were possibly (small ES: 0.30; 90% CI, -0.20 to 0.81; Δ = +1.88%) and likely (moderate ES: 0.81; 90% CI, -0.16 to 1.78; Δ = +2.38%) more improved in the OPL than in the PT intervention, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 2 different training programs improved physical performance outcomes during the in-season period. However, the combination of vertically and horizontally based training exercises (squat + hip thrust) at optimum power zone led to superior gains in COD and 30-m linear sprint performances.

Key concepts: Sprint, Plyometrics, Vertical jump, Squat, Mathematics, Countermovement, Jump, Physical therapy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of Plyometric Versus Optimum Power Load Training on Components of Physical Fitness in Young Male Soccer Players — Research Paper | ScholarLens