Triplicate PCR Reactions for 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon Sequencing are Unnecessary
Clarisse Marotz, Anukriti Sharma, Greg Humphrey, Neil Gottel, Chris Daum, Jack A. Gilbert, Emiley A. Eloe‐Fadrosh, Rob Knight
Abstract
Open-access reader
Clarisse Marotz, Anukriti Sharma, Greg Humphrey, Neil Gottel, Chris Daum, Jack A. Gilbert, Emiley A. Eloe‐Fadrosh, Rob Knight
Abstract
Open-access reader
Conventional wisdom holds that PCR amplification for sequencing should employ pooled replicate reactions to reduce bias due to jackpot effects and chimera formation. However, modern amplicon data analysis employs methods that may be less sensitive to such artifacts. Here we directly compare results from single versus triplicate reactions for 16S amplicon sequencing and find no significant impact of adopting a less labor-intensive single-reaction protocol.
OpenAlex reports 101 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Conventional wisdom holds that PCR amplification for sequencing should employ pooled replicate reactions to reduce bias due to jackpot effects and chimera formation. However, modern amplicon data analysis employs methods that may be less sensitive to such artifacts. Here we directly compare results from single versus triplicate reactions for 16S amplicon sequencing and find no significant impact of adopting a less labor-intensive single-reaction protocol.
Key concepts: Amplicon, Amplicon sequencing, Biology, Replicate, Polymerase chain reaction, 16S ribosomal RNA, Computational biology, Gene