2004•Unpublished venueRequires access

A round-robin to measure the direct piezoelectric coefficient using the Berlincourt method.

Maria J. Lodeiro, Mark Stewart, M G Cain

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

An international round-robin exercise to measure the direct piezoelectric coefficient (d33) using the Berlincourt method has taken place under the auspices of the Versailles Project on Advanced Materials And Standards (VAMAS). Three material compositions, representing both “soft” and “hard” piezoceramics, at two different nominal thicknesses, 1mm and 10mm, were distributed to the participating laboratories. Each laboratory received a separate set of specimens accompanied by a set of instructions specifying the measurement requirements and a list of controls and precautions, to be followed as closely as possible, and a report template for the results. All specimens were supplied poled and electroded, and were checked for outliers before being sent to participants. The results obtained using different equipment configurations and different test parameters from those recommended showed large inter-laboratory variations; however the measurements made by following the recommendations supplied with the samples agreed well with each other. Data on the repeatability and reproducibility of the technique are presented. Conclusions for the measurement procedure are: i) using current variable practices results in very poor inter-laboratory reproducibility ~15%; ii) using current variable practices produces good repeatability <5%; iii) following a standard procedure produces excellent repeatability <1%; iv) following a standard procedure results in very good inter-laboratory reproducibility <3%; v) soft, thin materials are a notable exception with repeatability ~4% and reproducibility ~10%, but this issue has long been recognised for these materials.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An international round-robin exercise to measure the direct piezoelectric coefficient (d33) using the Berlincourt method has taken place under the auspices of the Versailles Project on Advanced Materials And Standards (VAMAS). Three material compositions, representing both “soft” and “hard” piezoceramics, at two different nominal thicknesses, 1mm and 10mm, were distributed to the participating laboratories. Each laboratory received a separate set of specimens accompanied by a set of instructions specifying the measurement requirements and a list of controls and precautions, to be followed as closely as possible, and a report template for the results. All specimens were supplied poled and electroded, and were checked for outliers before being sent to participants. The results obtained using different equipment configurations and different test parameters from those recommended showed large inter-laboratory variations; however the measurements made by following the recommendations supplied with the samples agreed well with each other. Data on the repeatability and reproducibility of the technique are presented. Conclusions for the measurement procedure are: i) using current variable practices results in very poor inter-laboratory reproducibility ~15%; ii) using current variable practices produces good repeatability <5%; iii) following a standard procedure produces excellent repeatability <1%; iv) following a standard procedure results in very good inter-laboratory reproducibility <3%; v) soft, thin materials are a notable exception with repeatability ~4% and reproducibility ~10%, but this issue has long been recognised for these materials.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An international round-robin exercise to measure the direct piezoelectric coefficient (d33) using the Berlincourt method has taken place under the auspices of the Versailles Project on Advanced Materials And Standards (VAMAS). Three material compositions, representing both “soft” and “hard” piezoceramics, at two different nominal thicknesses, 1mm and 10mm, were distributed to the participating laboratories. Each laboratory received a separate set of specimens accompanied by a set of instructions specifying the measurement requirements and a list of controls and precautions, to be followed as closely as possible, and a report template for the results. All specimens were supplied poled and electroded, and were checked for outliers before being sent to participants. The results obtained using different equipment configurations and different test parameters from those recommended showed large inter-laboratory variations; however the measurements made by following the recommendations supplied with the samples agreed well with each other. Data on the repeatability and reproducibility of the technique are presented. Conclusions for the measurement procedure are: i) using current variable practices results in very poor inter-laboratory reproducibility ~15%; ii) using current variable practices produces good repeatability <5%; iii) following a standard procedure produces excellent repeatability <1%; iv) following a standard procedure results in very good inter-laboratory reproducibility <3%; v) soft, thin materials are a notable exception with repeatability ~4% and reproducibility ~10%, but this issue has long been recognised for these materials.

Key concepts: Repeatability, Reproducibility, Round robin test, Measure (data warehouse), Outlier, Coefficient of variation, Computer science, Materials science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A round-robin to measure the direct piezoelectric coefficient using the Berlincourt method. — Research Paper | ScholarLens