2019•Edward Elgar Publishing eBooksRequires access

A constructivist approach to the G20

Jonathan Luckhurst

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

This chapter examines the constructivist approach with respect to analyzing the G20. It begins with a broad overview of developments in constructivism since the 1990s, then indicates how recent constructivist scholars have built on earlier studies. The subsequent discussion focuses on the author’s research, which integrates constructivist insights with conceptual tools from other approaches, in analyzing global economic governance and the G20. It emphasizes how actors’ strategic, political, and cognitive authority influences the G20, as well as assessing constructivist understandings of the significance of organizational and policy norms, practices, and socialization. This includes an analysis of the construction of new policy norms and practices since the global financial crisis of 2008–09, for example in the contexts of macroprudential financial regulation and sustainable development. The chapter concludes that constructivist IR provides useful insights for enhancing the legitimacy of the G20.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter examines the constructivist approach with respect to analyzing the G20. It begins with a broad overview of developments in constructivism since the 1990s, then indicates how recent constructivist scholars have built on earlier studies. The subsequent discussion focuses on the author’s research, which integrates constructivist insights with conceptual tools from other approaches, in analyzing global economic governance and the G20. It emphasizes how actors’ strategic, political, and cognitive authority influences the G20, as well as assessing constructivist understandings of the significance of organizational and policy norms, practices, and socialization. This includes an analysis of the construction of new policy norms and practices since the global financial crisis of 2008–09, for example in the contexts of macroprudential financial regulation and sustainable development. The chapter concludes that constructivist IR provides useful insights for enhancing the legitimacy of the G20.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter examines the constructivist approach with respect to analyzing the G20. It begins with a broad overview of developments in constructivism since the 1990s, then indicates how recent constructivist scholars have built on earlier studies. The subsequent discussion focuses on the author’s research, which integrates constructivist insights with conceptual tools from other approaches, in analyzing global economic governance and the G20. It emphasizes how actors’ strategic, political, and cognitive authority influences the G20, as well as assessing constructivist understandings of the significance of organizational and policy norms, practices, and socialization. This includes an analysis of the construction of new policy norms and practices since the global financial crisis of 2008–09, for example in the contexts of macroprudential financial regulation and sustainable development. The chapter concludes that constructivist IR provides useful insights for enhancing the legitimacy of the G20.

Key concepts: Constructivism (international relations), Constructivist teaching methods, Legitimacy, Corporate governance, Political science, Politics, Socialization, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A constructivist approach to the G20 — Research Paper | ScholarLens